2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13337-019-00540-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular evidence of human papillomaviruses in the retinoblastoma tumor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Central region of Brazil, screening head, neck and breast cancer patients for high-risk and low-risk HPV type gene sequences, HPV type 70 (low-risk type) was detected by the Real Time PCR (Table 1), in a patient with oral cancer (head and neck cancer group) that previously yielded negative result by the hybrid capture assay [82,83]. As stated before, findings of any viral gene sequence claimed to be enrolled in the cancer etiology is not a definitive proof, as evidences reported by Ciccarese et al [88] of HPV positivity of 51 % and 43 % among subjects with genital lesions and apparently healthy subjects, respectively; Sontakke et al [85] found 44.23 % and 5.76 % positivity for HPV type 16 and HPV type 18 respectively, in a group of asymptomatic women with normal cervix, while women with benign cervical lesion had 38.46% and 3.84% HPV type 16 and HPV type 18 positivity respectively, and 62.5 % and 22.5% HPV type 16 and 18 positivity respectively, in a group of women with cervical malignancy. As observed, HPV positivity ratio is elevated among cancer patients, anyway healthy subjects harbor HPV genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the Central region of Brazil, screening head, neck and breast cancer patients for high-risk and low-risk HPV type gene sequences, HPV type 70 (low-risk type) was detected by the Real Time PCR (Table 1), in a patient with oral cancer (head and neck cancer group) that previously yielded negative result by the hybrid capture assay [82,83]. As stated before, findings of any viral gene sequence claimed to be enrolled in the cancer etiology is not a definitive proof, as evidences reported by Ciccarese et al [88] of HPV positivity of 51 % and 43 % among subjects with genital lesions and apparently healthy subjects, respectively; Sontakke et al [85] found 44.23 % and 5.76 % positivity for HPV type 16 and HPV type 18 respectively, in a group of asymptomatic women with normal cervix, while women with benign cervical lesion had 38.46% and 3.84% HPV type 16 and HPV type 18 positivity respectively, and 62.5 % and 22.5% HPV type 16 and 18 positivity respectively, in a group of women with cervical malignancy. As observed, HPV positivity ratio is elevated among cancer patients, anyway healthy subjects harbor HPV genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The scientists claimed that their finding may suggest a presumptive link between infection with HPV and incidence of sporadic RB. 31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they found out that the HPV‐positive RB cases all had unilateral and unfamiliar sporadic RB tumors. The scientists claimed that their finding may suggest a presumptive link between infection with HPV and incidence of sporadic RB 31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence of HPV in retinoblastoma has been shown with wide variations in different populations (4.6% - 69.7%) with the use of molecular methods for viruses detection (Antoneli et al, 2011; Bhuvaneswari et al, 2012; Espinoza et al, 2005; Gillison et al, 2007; Javanmard et al, 2019; Mohan et al, 2009; Montoya-Fuentes et al, 2003; Orjuela et al, 2000; Palazzi et al, 2003; Shetty et al, 2012; Shukla et al, 2009). Additionally, techniques such as in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry have been performed and allowed possible causal relationship between HPV and RB development (Antoneli et al, 2011; Bhuvaneswari et al, 2012; Espinoza et al, 2005; Gillison et al, 2007; Palazzi et al, 2003; Shetty et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%