1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)95155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular emission cavity analysis—a new flame analytical technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meantime, several techniques have been reported for the determination of S2082" (14)(15)(16)(17)(18). For example, about 10"3 ( = mol L'1) S2082" was detected using alternating current polarography (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the meantime, several techniques have been reported for the determination of S2082" (14)(15)(16)(17)(18). For example, about 10"3 ( = mol L'1) S2082" was detected using alternating current polarography (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that nanogram amounts of sulfur-containing species, such as S042" and S2082", could be determined by a flame analytical technique, based on S2 emission, called molecular emission cavity analysis (MECA) (17,18). However, the MECA method is not specific for S2082" and requires an expensive instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfite solutions were stabilized for several days by the addition of sufficient disodium EDTA to make them 8 x 10"4 M in Na2EDTA, and then stored in 10-mL evacuated blood collection tubes to minimize air oxidation. As suggested by Belcher (30), solutions were made 0.10 M in phosphoric acid to provide optimum conditions for molecular sulfur emission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling coil was used to ensure more reproducible sample temperatures prior to introduction into the flame, to hasten cooling between sample runs, and to thermally isolate the cavity portion of the rod during analysis. As suggested by Belcher (30), a quartz cup 6 mm in diameter and 4 mm deep was inserted in the end of the stainless steel sampling rod (Figure 2, B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation