1991
DOI: 10.1021/ac00009a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct current electrogenerated chemiluminescent microdetermination of peroxydisulfate in aqueous solution

Abstract: The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Interagency Agreement IAG No. DW13933643-01-0 to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It has been subject to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrochemiluminescence of the Ru(bpy) 2 , correlation coef®cient: 0.999, n 6). This result is comparable to that of the Ru(bpz) 3 2 electrochemiluminescent method at a stationary working electrode [18,19]. At S 2 O 2À 8 concentrations higher than 1 mmol L À1 , the intensity drops off sharply and is completely suppressed (`0.005 % of the maximum) at 100 mmol L À1 (Fig.…”
Section: àsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electrochemiluminescence of the Ru(bpy) 2 , correlation coef®cient: 0.999, n 6). This result is comparable to that of the Ru(bpz) 3 2 electrochemiluminescent method at a stationary working electrode [18,19]. At S 2 O 2À 8 concentrations higher than 1 mmol L À1 , the intensity drops off sharply and is completely suppressed (`0.005 % of the maximum) at 100 mmol L À1 (Fig.…”
Section: àsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Several methods have been developed for the determination of S 2 O 2À 8 , for example, a reductimetric method, a potentiometric method, a¯ame analytical method, and a Ru(bpz) 2 3 electrochemiluminescent method [14±19]. Among these methods, the Ru(bpz) 2 3 electrochemiluminescent method is one of the most suitable methods for the microdetermination of S 2 O 2À 8 in aqueous solution [18,19]; however, Ru(bpz) 2 3 is relatively expensive and the Ru(bpz) 2 3 electrochemiluminescent method also suffers from electrode fouling [18,19]. It has been reported that ECL of the Ru(bpy) 2 3 aS 2 O 2À 8 system could be obtained in partially aqueous solution and ECL reactions often happened near the surface of the electrode [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, at pH above 7.0, the ECL enhancement decreased, because more basic solutions would make H 2 O 2 unstable 24 and lead to the consumption of SO 4 •− by the scavenging reaction with OH − . 34 Therefore, the number of HO…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 15 years, many analytical applications of ECL using the Ru chelate have been studied for measuring chemical materials such as carbonate compounds, amine compounds and others 2,3 , and for detecting the total DNA. 4,5 In the former measurement system, the ECL signal linearity was 1000 to 10000 times of magnitude in accordance with the analyte concentration.…”
Section: Ecl Emitting Efficiency By Molecular Size Of Eclproducing Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] A preliminary ECL immunoassay was reported by Bard in 1984, using a newly synthesized Ru-chelate having N-hydroxysuccinimide residue (Ru-chelate-NHS), which enabled the protein moiety to be labeled 6 (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%