2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(01)01451-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics study of dimer flipping on perfect and defective Si() surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 25 and are ranging from 5˚to 19˚. The reported tilt angle by the exact diagonalization of the same tightbinding Hamiltonian is θ ∼ 14˚, 26 while our result based on the KS method is θ = 13.4˚with the size of the KS ν K = 30. This result indicates that the present KS method extracts the essential character of the original Hamiltonian well.…”
Section: Tilt Angle Of Surface Dimersmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 25 and are ranging from 5˚to 19˚. The reported tilt angle by the exact diagonalization of the same tightbinding Hamiltonian is θ ∼ 14˚, 26 while our result based on the KS method is θ = 13.4˚with the size of the KS ν K = 30. This result indicates that the present KS method extracts the essential character of the original Hamiltonian well.…”
Section: Tilt Angle Of Surface Dimersmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…These values agree well with the exact calculation using the same Hamiltonian, E (2×1) − E (4×2) = 73.6 meV/dimer and E (2×2) − E (4×2) = 1.2 meV/dimer, respectively. 26 This shows that the numerical error with the KS method is small and the present method gives a satisfactory results in a fine energy scale with tight-binding Hamiltonian. On the other hand, we should comment that the tightbinding formulation itself can be the another origin of an error.…”
Section: Energy Difference Between Different Configurations Of Dimeri...mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[31] In the variational Wannier-state method, the initial guess of the wavefunctions are prepared to be the lone-pair state of (|s +|p z )/ √ 2 for surface states and to be the sp 3 -bonding states for other (bulk) states. The three methods reproduce the energy differences satisfactorily among the (2 × 1), (2 × 2), and (4×2) surfaces, when these results are compared with those of the eigen-state calculation with the present Hamiltonian [33] and the standard ab initio calculation [34].…”
Section: Comparison Between Krylov-subspace and Wannier-state Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the surface of a Si-based semiconductor, each atom has two unstable dangling bonds with the presence of only one electron. In order to reduce the number of dangling bonds and maintain stability in the dimer theory, [9,10] two adjacent atoms in the surface are paired to form a strong σ bond and a weak π bond; strong bonds directly lead to the 2 × 1 rebuilding of surface atoms, which form dimer rows. [9,10] There are four kinds of dimer totally, they are Si-Si, Ge-Si, Si-Ge, Ge-Ge.…”
Section: Dimer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%