2007
DOI: 10.1517/17530059.1.2.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular diagnostics of α1-antitrypsin deficiency

Abstract: Diagnosis of α1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is based on serum protein level, phenotyping and genotyping. Each of these methods has serious limitations and not enough accuracy to be used alone. Combinations of two different techniques are recommended to increase the reliability of AAT deficiency testing. Changes of AAT serum levels can result from clinical conditions and the inflammatory response may increase protein level. Phenotyping discriminates AAT variants due to the altered isoelectric point of the prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meantime, most of the clinical biochemistry and forensic medicine typing has switched from phenotype to genotype, taking advantage of the acknowledged features of DNA – stoichiometric presence in all cell types from embryo to adult stage, chemical stability, easy amplification. For instance, for the diagnosis of α 1 ‐antitrypsin deficiency associated with the Z variant (Glu342Lys) different genetic tests – including direct sequencing of PCR amplification products 78, amplification‐reverse hybridization 79 and real‐time PCR 80 – have been proposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, most of the clinical biochemistry and forensic medicine typing has switched from phenotype to genotype, taking advantage of the acknowledged features of DNA – stoichiometric presence in all cell types from embryo to adult stage, chemical stability, easy amplification. For instance, for the diagnosis of α 1 ‐antitrypsin deficiency associated with the Z variant (Glu342Lys) different genetic tests – including direct sequencing of PCR amplification products 78, amplification‐reverse hybridization 79 and real‐time PCR 80 – have been proposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%