2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0ee01763a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular design of a non-fullerene acceptor enables a P3HT-based organic solar cell with 9.46% efficiency

Abstract: The advantage in low cost makes P3HT one of the most attractive electron donors for photovoltaic applications, but the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the P3HT-based organic solar cells (OSCs)...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
174
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[103] From the perspective of the acceptor, Hou and coworkers changed the end group of BTP-4Cl to reduce its miscibility with P3HT. [104] The enhanced χ of the system drives an appropriate phase separation, increasing the J SC and FF significantly. [104] In addition, the side chains of both donor and acceptor materials also affect the phase separation because the variation of solubility changes the χ parameter of the system.…”
Section: Morphology Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[103] From the perspective of the acceptor, Hou and coworkers changed the end group of BTP-4Cl to reduce its miscibility with P3HT. [104] The enhanced χ of the system drives an appropriate phase separation, increasing the J SC and FF significantly. [104] In addition, the side chains of both donor and acceptor materials also affect the phase separation because the variation of solubility changes the χ parameter of the system.…”
Section: Morphology Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[104] The enhanced χ of the system drives an appropriate phase separation, increasing the J SC and FF significantly. [104] In addition, the side chains of both donor and acceptor materials also affect the phase separation because the variation of solubility changes the χ parameter of the system. [105,106] However, there are still open questions about the relationship between molecular structure and miscibility.…”
Section: Morphology Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through molecular engineering along with finely manipulating the film morphology (which will be discussed below), at present, P3HT:nonfullerene blend systems have been boosted to 7-9%. [116][117][118][119][120][121] Obviously, the photovoltaic performance of P3HT:nonfullerene systems have outperformed the counterparts based on fullerene derivatives, owing to the reduced E loss and extended absorption of P3HT:nonfullerene blend films. Despite the great progress, the absorption of a majority of P3HT:nonfullerene systems were still limited within 800 nm, which impedes the further enhancement of the device efficiency.…”
Section: Design Of Nonfullerene Acceptors To Pair With P3htmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] As Heeger and co‐workers reported that the efficient charge separation results from a bicontinuous network of internal donor–acceptor heterojunctions, bulk heterojunction (BHJ) formed by an interpenetrating blend of low‐bandgap conjugate polymer and electron‐accepting fullerene derivatives constitutes a very promising development in the field to date. [ 2 ] Many approaches have been used to improve the organic device performance nearly 18% in power conversion efficiency (PCE), [ 3 ] such as the modified acceptor structure of fullerene‐based, [ 4–6 ] the innovations in optically active material design, [ 7 ] use of additive, [ 8 ] blend morphology control, [ 9,10 ] and cell architectures. [ 11 ] Intensive research of potential materials as future photovoltaic technologies has been conducted, [ 3–11 ] especially discusses about the mechanisms of carrier transportation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 ] Many approaches have been used to improve the organic device performance nearly 18% in power conversion efficiency (PCE), [ 3 ] such as the modified acceptor structure of fullerene‐based, [ 4–6 ] the innovations in optically active material design, [ 7 ] use of additive, [ 8 ] blend morphology control, [ 9,10 ] and cell architectures. [ 11 ] Intensive research of potential materials as future photovoltaic technologies has been conducted, [ 3–11 ] especially discusses about the mechanisms of carrier transportation. [ 12–15 ] However, the performance improvements in all cases are strongly dependent on the electronic structure at an interface, which, in turn, is governed by many factors, such as energetic offset or energy barrier, induced by the electronic coupling of the materials and how the materials link to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%