The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.3906/bot-1608-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All the accessions were classified into two linkage groups in accordance with the morphological data. This result was similar to the results of previous studies where 35 pea accessions had been classified into two major clusters and seven sub-clusters (Nisar et al, 2017), and 28 pea lines into three groups (Gixhari et al, 2014).…”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All the accessions were classified into two linkage groups in accordance with the morphological data. This result was similar to the results of previous studies where 35 pea accessions had been classified into two major clusters and seven sub-clusters (Nisar et al, 2017), and 28 pea lines into three groups (Gixhari et al, 2014).…”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For data analysis, the amplified bands generated by SSR-PCR amplification were scored based on the presence (1) or absence (0) of bands for each primer (Nisar et al, 2017). Cluster analysis was performed on the molecular data using the un-weighted pair group method based on arithmetic means (UPGMA) algorithm.…”
Section: Molecular Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations