2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2004.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterisation of Trypanosoma rangeli strains isolated from Rhodnius ecuadoriensis in Peru, R. colombiensis in Colombia and R. pallescens in Panama, supports a co-evolutionary association between parasites and vectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
23
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent studies clearly showed host-parasite specific associations between T. rangeli-Rhodnius spp. and a hypothesis that these triatomines act as biological filters in the transmission of genetically distinct populations of T. rangeli (11,14,15 (11). Such association agrees with the report of a trypanolytic protein present in R. prolixus hemolymph, which selectively lyses (KP1-) strains isolated from R. pallescens, R. colombiensis and R. ecuadoriensis, but not (KP1+) strains (18).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent studies clearly showed host-parasite specific associations between T. rangeli-Rhodnius spp. and a hypothesis that these triatomines act as biological filters in the transmission of genetically distinct populations of T. rangeli (11,14,15 (11). Such association agrees with the report of a trypanolytic protein present in R. prolixus hemolymph, which selectively lyses (KP1-) strains isolated from R. pallescens, R. colombiensis and R. ecuadoriensis, but not (KP1+) strains (18).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Based on the current hypothesis regarding T. rangeli and Rhodnius spp. co-evolution (11,14,15), we propose that infectivity (intestinal, hemolymphatic and glandular) and the transmission of the T. rangeli strain SC-58 (characterized as KP1-) would be greater and more efficient in R. pictipes. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to analyze the susceptibility of four Rhodnius species (R. robustus, R. neglectus, R. nasutus and R. pictipes) to a Brazilian strain of T. rangeli (SC-58/KP1-).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T. rangeli KP1(+) strains have been isolated from domiciliated R. prolixus in Honduras, Colombia and Venezuela, from wild R. neglectus in the Federal District of Brazil (Urrea et al 2005) and wild R. prolixus in Casanare (Colombia) (unpublished data). On the other hand, T. rangeli KP1(-) strains have been isolated from wild R. pallescens from Panama and Colombia, from wild R. colombiensis in the central region of Colombia and from domiciliated R. ecuadoriensis in Peru (Vallejo et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity between the vector and the parasite strain which it transmits has been pointed out; each Rhodnius species seems to select the T. rangeli subpopulation to which it is susceptible in nature so that it can then be transmitted to the vertebrate host via insect bite . Nevertheless, a close association has been observed between T. rangeli KP1(+) and vectors from the prolixus group (which includes Rhodnius prolixus and Rhodnius neglectus) and between T. rangeli KP1(-) and vectors from the pallescens group (including Rhodnius pallescens, Rhodnius colombiensis and Rhodnius ecuadoriensis) , Urrea et al 2005. Recent parasite-vector interaction studies have shown a trypanolytic factor in R. prolixus hemolymph impeding the development of T. rangeli KP1(-) strains isolated from R. pallescens, R. colombiensis and R. ecuadoriensis (Sánchez et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colombia is one of the countries in which T. cruzi shares vectors and reservoirs with T. rangeli 7,13,14 . Recently, two important epidemiological groups of T. rangeli have been described: KP1(-) strains, associated with the adaptive line of Rhodnius, represented by R. colombiensis, R. pallescens, and R. ecuadoriensis, and KP1(+) strains, associated with R. prolixus [30][31][32] . These two groups have been defined on the basis of independent mitochondrial (minicircle profile dimorphism obtained by kDNA PCR amplification) and nuclear (mini-exon PCR amplification) markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%