Abstract:Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) represents an effective intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). One priority of this research field is the clarification of ECT response mechanisms and the identification of biomarkers predicting its outcomes. We propose an overview of the molecular studies on ECT, concerning its course and outcome prediction, including also animal studies on electroconvulsive seizures (ECS), an experimental analogue of ECT. Most of these investigations underlie biological systems… Show more
“…Novel pharmacological approaches including ketamine are also gaining attention, however they yet did not present a superiority of effect compared to electroconvulsive therapy ( Veraart et al, 2021 ). Despite the frequent and widespread use of ECT, possible cognitive impairments and other adverse effects were described and its molecular mechanisms underlying its efficacy remains largely unclear [for review ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 )]. Thus, before engaging into ECT treatment, the search for predictors of ECT response in animal models of anxiety/depression would benefit to patients with MDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression studies on gene transcripts and microRNAs are rare and genetic studies are sparse. To date, no conclusive evidence regarding ECT molecular markers of clinical response has been reached ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical studies tried to identify novel biomarkers predicting ECT outcomes and responses to targeted treatments [for review, ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 )]. Thus, ECT modulates the expression of 10 and ≈40 proteins in the blood of patients after either acute or chronic ECT, respectively ( Stelzhammer et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, AD treatment adjuncts with chronic ECT changes proteins profile compared to patients receiving only ECT. However, most of the studies are concentrated on one or few markers and many studies are relatively old, with small sample sizes and methodological biases ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 ).…”
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the psychiatric disorder with the highest prevalence in the world. Pharmacological antidepressant treatment (AD), such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI, i.e., fluoxetine (Flx)] is the first line of treatment for MDD. Despite its efficacy, lack of AD response occurs in numerous patients characterizing Difficult-to-treat Depression. ElectroConvulsive Therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment inducing rapid improvement in depressive symptoms and high remission rates of ∼50–63% in patients with pharmaco-resistant depression. Nevertheless, the need to develop reliable treatment response predictors to guide personalized AD strategies and supplement clinical observation is becoming a pressing clinical objective. Here, we propose to establish a proteomic peripheral biomarkers signature of ECT response in an anxio/depressive animal model of non-response to AD. Using an emotionality score based on the analysis complementary behavioral tests of anxiety/depression (Elevated Plus Maze, Novelty Suppressed Feeding, Splash Test), we showed that a 4-week corticosterone treatment (35 μg/ml, Cort model) in C57BL/6JRj male mice induced an anxiety/depressive-like behavior. A 28-day chronic fluoxetine treatment (Flx, 18 mg/kg/day) reduced corticosterone-induced increase in emotional behavior. A 50% decrease in emotionality score threshold before and after Flx, was used to separate Flx-responding mice (Flx-R, n = 18), or Flx non-responder mice (Flx-NR, n = 7). Then, Flx-NR mice received seven sessions of electroconvulsive seizure (ECS, equivalent to ECT in humans) and blood was collected before and after ECS treatment. Chronic ECS normalized the elevated emotionality observed in Flx-NR mice. Then, proteins were extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and isolated for proteomic analysis using a high-resolution MS Orbitrap. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD037392. The proteomic analysis revealed a signature of 33 peripheral proteins associated with response to ECS (7 down and 26 upregulated). These proteins were previously associated with mental disorders and involved in regulating pathways which participate to the depressive disorder etiology.
“…Novel pharmacological approaches including ketamine are also gaining attention, however they yet did not present a superiority of effect compared to electroconvulsive therapy ( Veraart et al, 2021 ). Despite the frequent and widespread use of ECT, possible cognitive impairments and other adverse effects were described and its molecular mechanisms underlying its efficacy remains largely unclear [for review ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 )]. Thus, before engaging into ECT treatment, the search for predictors of ECT response in animal models of anxiety/depression would benefit to patients with MDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression studies on gene transcripts and microRNAs are rare and genetic studies are sparse. To date, no conclusive evidence regarding ECT molecular markers of clinical response has been reached ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical studies tried to identify novel biomarkers predicting ECT outcomes and responses to targeted treatments [for review, ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 )]. Thus, ECT modulates the expression of 10 and ≈40 proteins in the blood of patients after either acute or chronic ECT, respectively ( Stelzhammer et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, AD treatment adjuncts with chronic ECT changes proteins profile compared to patients receiving only ECT. However, most of the studies are concentrated on one or few markers and many studies are relatively old, with small sample sizes and methodological biases ( Maffioletti et al, 2021 ).…”
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the psychiatric disorder with the highest prevalence in the world. Pharmacological antidepressant treatment (AD), such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI, i.e., fluoxetine (Flx)] is the first line of treatment for MDD. Despite its efficacy, lack of AD response occurs in numerous patients characterizing Difficult-to-treat Depression. ElectroConvulsive Therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment inducing rapid improvement in depressive symptoms and high remission rates of ∼50–63% in patients with pharmaco-resistant depression. Nevertheless, the need to develop reliable treatment response predictors to guide personalized AD strategies and supplement clinical observation is becoming a pressing clinical objective. Here, we propose to establish a proteomic peripheral biomarkers signature of ECT response in an anxio/depressive animal model of non-response to AD. Using an emotionality score based on the analysis complementary behavioral tests of anxiety/depression (Elevated Plus Maze, Novelty Suppressed Feeding, Splash Test), we showed that a 4-week corticosterone treatment (35 μg/ml, Cort model) in C57BL/6JRj male mice induced an anxiety/depressive-like behavior. A 28-day chronic fluoxetine treatment (Flx, 18 mg/kg/day) reduced corticosterone-induced increase in emotional behavior. A 50% decrease in emotionality score threshold before and after Flx, was used to separate Flx-responding mice (Flx-R, n = 18), or Flx non-responder mice (Flx-NR, n = 7). Then, Flx-NR mice received seven sessions of electroconvulsive seizure (ECS, equivalent to ECT in humans) and blood was collected before and after ECS treatment. Chronic ECS normalized the elevated emotionality observed in Flx-NR mice. Then, proteins were extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and isolated for proteomic analysis using a high-resolution MS Orbitrap. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD037392. The proteomic analysis revealed a signature of 33 peripheral proteins associated with response to ECS (7 down and 26 upregulated). These proteins were previously associated with mental disorders and involved in regulating pathways which participate to the depressive disorder etiology.
The article by Howes et al [1] presents a valuable framework and broad access to the topic of treatment-resistant disorders in psychiatry and deserves to be read by both researchers and clinicians. Nevertheless, we would like to comment on the too short and maybe even misleading passage on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).The relative importance of ECT for the treatment of the most severe and treatment-resistant disorders in psychiatry and its potential for a better understanding of the neurobiology of treatment response [2,3] should merit more than only three sentences in an otherwise comprehensive overview. From a practitioner's viewpoint, ECT is much more than an approved therapy for "treatment-resistant depression and mania" [4].
The article by Howes et al. [1] presents a valuable framework and broad access to the topic of treatment-resistant disorders in psychiatry and deserves to be read by both researchers and clinicians. Nevertheless, we would like to comment on the too short and maybe even misleading passage on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).The relative importance of ECT for the treatment of the most severe and treatment-resistant disorders in psychiatry and its potential for a better understanding of the neurobiology of treatment response [2,3] should merit more than only three sentences in an otherwise comprehensive overview. From a practitioner's viewpoint, ECT is much more than an approved therapy for "treatment-resistant depression and mania" [4]. There is further clear evidence for its effectiveness in schizophrenia [5] and catatonia [6], and ECT is recognized as a standard treatment in guidelines from major psychiatric associations [4].Beyond this clinical perspective, the authors note that ECT's mechanism of action is only poorly defined. Not to forget: If we perfectly understood how ECT works, we would as a corollary have perfectly understood the pathophysiology of some of the most impairing psychiatric disorders. Instead of citing recent reviews on mechanisms of action of ECT [7] the authors (hopefully inadvertently) cite a review article from one of the most obvious ideological opponents of ECT, who concludes the abstract of his article by saying that "ECT affects the brain in a similar manner as severe stress or brain trauma", which obviously is not true [8]. On the contrary, there are several replicated findings that may well represent physiologically relevant factors that are in part associated with, and contribute to, clinical response [9]. Metaanalytic evidence suggests regionally specific brain volume increases, e.g. in the hippocampal region [10]. Moreover, there is corroborative evidence for increased levels of neurotrophic factors after ECT [11] and the reduction of systemic inflammation in the treatment course [12], all factors that correspond well to current hypotheses on depression pathophysiology [13].To conclude, we think that ECT should be given the consideration it deserves-from both a clinical and scientific perspective-to exploit its full potential for the treatment of severely affected patients, identification of biological markers of treatment response, and the elucidation of the pathophysiology of treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders. For patients with the most serious forms of treatment-resistant mood and psychotic disorders, ECT should be a standard, go-to treatment, not an afterthought.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.