Using a one-megabase BAC-based array comparative genomic hybridization technique (aCGH), we have investigated a series of 16 low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and their subsequent progression to higher-grade malignancies. The most frequent chromosome imbalances in primary tumors were gains of chromosomes 7q, 8q, and 22q, and losses of chromosomes 1p, 13q, and 19q. In tumor progression, gains of chromosomes 11q, 7q, 20q, and 21q, and losses of chromosomes 9p, including CDKN2A locus, 19q, 14q, 1p, and 6q were the most frequent genomic disequilibria. Progressive tumors were more imbalanced than primary tumors in terms of altered chromosomal arms (3.8 vs. 6.6 in mean abnormal chromosomal arm) and altered BACs (17 vs. 21%). Interestingly, putative novel candidate genes associated with glioma progression were identified, in particular DOCK8, PTPRD, CER1, TPHO, DHFR, MSH3, ETS1, ACACA, and CSE1L.

Schizophrenia and autism spectra disorders are currently conceptualized as distinct clinical categories. However, the relationship between these two nosological entities has been revisited in recent years due to the evidence that they share some important clinical and neurobiological features, putting into question the nature and the extent of their commonalities and differences. In this respect, some core symptoms that are present in both disorders, such as social cognitive deficits, could be a primary target of investigation. This review briefly summarizes the commonalities and overlapping features between schizophrenia and autism spectra disorders in social cognitive functions, considering this construct in a Research Domain Criteria perspective. The clinical manifestation of deficits in social cognition are similar in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and autism spectrum disorders, and brain areas that appear to be altered in relation to these impairments are largely shared; however, the results of various studies suggest that, in some cases, the qualitative nature of these alterations may be different in the two spectra. Moreover, relevant differences could be present at the level of brain networks and connections. More research is required in this field, regarding molecular and genetic aspects of both spectra, to better define the neurobiological mechanisms involved in social cognition deficits, with the objective of developing specific and targeted treatments.

ABSTRACT:Rationale:Clobazam has been used successfully in adults and children with partial epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of clobazam as add-on therapy in children with epileptic encephalopathy.Methods:This was a retrospective study conducted at the pediatric epilepsy clinic of our university hospital. Children less than 18-years of age with epileptic encephalopathy were included in the study. Clobazam was introduced as add-on therapy, starting with 5 mg/Kg/day and increased in minimally effective doses, up to the maximum tolerated dose. Data were obtained from clinical files and follow-up visits.Results:Ninety-seven patients were included in the study (39 girls), aged between 1 and 17-years-old (mean = 9.9). Twenty-six patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, seven had myoclonic astatic epilepsy, nine had West syndrome and, in 57 patients, the type of epileptic encephalopathy could not be determined. Clobazam dosage ranged from 5 to 60 mg/day (mean = 37.5 mg/day). Forty (41%) patients presented with adverse events, most of which were mild and transitory, and clobazam needed to be withdrawn in only 11 patients. Nine (9.2%) patients were seizure-free after clobazam adjunctive therapy. In 11 (11.3%) patients seizure improvement was >75%, in 16 (16.5%) it was >50%, in 17 (17.5%) improvement was <50% and in 44 (45.5%) there was no change in seizure frequency. Three patients were lost to follow-up. In 85% of the patients with seizure improvement, the results lasted for more than one year.Conclusion:Clobazam is safe and effective in the treatment of epileptic encephalopathies of childhood.

Despite extensive research on COVID-19’s impact on healthcare workers, few studies have targeted mental health workers (MHWs) and none have investigated previous traumatic events. We investigated psychological distress in MHWs after the first lockdown in Italy to understand which COVID-19, sociodemographic, and professional variables represented greater effects, and the role of previous trauma. The survey included sociodemographic and professional questions, COVID-19 variables, and the questionnaires Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5), Impact of Event Scale—Revised (IES-R), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 (DASS-21). On the 271 MHWs who completed the survey (73.1% female; mean age 45.37), we obtained significant effects for contagion fear, experience of patients’ death, increased workload, and worse team relationship during the first wave. Nurses were more affected and showed more post-traumatic stress symptoms, assessed by IES-R, and more depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms, assessed by DASS-21. The strongest risk factors for distress were greater age, professional role, increased workload, worse team relationship, and separation from family members. Previous experience of severe human suffering and unwanted sexual experiences negatively impacted IES-R and DASS-21 scores. Being a psychiatrist or psychologist/psychotherapist and good team relationships were protective factors. Recent but also previous severe stressful events might represent relevant risk factors for distress, reducing resilience skills. Identifying vulnerable factors and professional categories may help in the development of dedicated measures to prevent emotional burden and support psychological health. Highlights: Psychological distress in mental health workers in the COVID-19 pandemic is more frequent in nurses, who experience more depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Previous and recent stressful events are risk factors for distress and should guide intervention strategies.