2020
DOI: 10.22541/au.159527001.10291650
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and serological surveillance of equine piroplasmosis in the Republic of Korea between 2016 and 2017

Abstract: Equine piroplasmosis (EP), a tick-borne disease affecting horses, is caused by Babesia caballi and Theileria equi. We investigate antigen and antibody of EP in whole bloods and sera of horses in the Republic of Korea during 2016-2017. We collected 1,650 whole bloods and sera of horses in 16 regions and 222 farms to examine antigen and antibody of EP by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of 18S rRNA gene and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. T. equi antigen and antibody was detected in 1 of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection of E. chaffeensis , T. equi , and B. caballi from cattle grazing in ROK during 2010 and 2011 showed that 19.4%, 7.2%, and 0.35%, respectively, of the tick pools were positive for the three pathogens [ 27 ], and T. equi infections in horses have been serologically confirmed [ 28 ]. However, the three pathogens were not detected in ticks collected from horses and associated vegetation in the ROK during 2016 and 2017 in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of E. chaffeensis , T. equi , and B. caballi from cattle grazing in ROK during 2010 and 2011 showed that 19.4%, 7.2%, and 0.35%, respectively, of the tick pools were positive for the three pathogens [ 27 ], and T. equi infections in horses have been serologically confirmed [ 28 ]. However, the three pathogens were not detected in ticks collected from horses and associated vegetation in the ROK during 2016 and 2017 in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%