Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1986
DOI: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.96.149.1986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and Isotopic Analysis of Core Gases and Gas Hydrates, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 96

Abstract: Molecular and isotopic compositions of void gases from Sites 618 and 619 were determined. The gases were predominantly methane with the C L /C 2 ratios averaging 4,000 and 26,000 at Sites 618 and 619, respectively. The δ 13 C-Cj values at Site 618 were nearly constant, ranging from -70.1 to -73.7‰. δ 13 C-CHj values for Site 619 between 76 and 178 meters sub-bottom ranged from -94.8 to -70.8‰, becoming progressively heavier with depth. The molecular and isotopic compositions at both sites are characteristic of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These similar patterns in both hy drate-bearing and hydrate-free sediments suggest that the hydrate formation causes no 13C fraction ation in methane (Claypool et al, 1985). The S13C values of methane in gas hydrates are similar to those of interstitial gases in sediments at the depth where the gas hydrates were found, also suggest ing that hydrate formation involves no 13C frac tionation in methane (Pflaum et al, 1986;Kennicutt et al, 1993). Furthermore, no obvious isotopic effect has been observed during controlled decomposition of CH4 hydrate (Claypool et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…These similar patterns in both hy drate-bearing and hydrate-free sediments suggest that the hydrate formation causes no 13C fraction ation in methane (Claypool et al, 1985). The S13C values of methane in gas hydrates are similar to those of interstitial gases in sediments at the depth where the gas hydrates were found, also suggest ing that hydrate formation involves no 13C frac tionation in methane (Pflaum et al, 1986;Kennicutt et al, 1993). Furthermore, no obvious isotopic effect has been observed during controlled decomposition of CH4 hydrate (Claypool et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Perhaps the initial report of gas hydrates being encountered below the GoM seafloor, with no obvious connection to seafloor anomalies, was the visual observation of mm-to cm-scale "crystals" of gas hydrate in sediment recovered from 20 to 40 mbsf at Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 96 Site 618 in the Orca basin (Pflaum et al, 1986) in 1983. The nature and form of the gas hydrate observed in situ is not clear, although the sediments were described as primarily mud-rich with potential preferred occurrence of the gas hydrate within minor interbedded biogenic (primarily shell fragments) sands.…”
Section: Early Phases Of Investigationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…northwestern Gulf of Mexico MacDonald et al, 1994;Sassen, 2000, 2001;Sassen et al, 1999Sassen et al, , 2001, Hydrate Ridge (Hovland et al, 1995;Suess et al, 1999Suess et al, , 2001Trehu et al, 1999), and Haakon Mosby (Bogdanov et al, 1999;Ginsburg et al, 1999). In stratigraphic accumulation gases are transported along permeable horizons, e.g., Blake ridge (Xu and Ruppel, 1999;Dickens et al, 1997), Gulf of Mexico minibasins (Milkov and Sassen, 2001;Pflaum et al, 1986), Nankai trough (Matsumoto et al, 2001), and Mallik (Dallimore et al, 1999). A combination of both structural and stratigraphic transport and trapping mechanisms are also possible (Diaconescu and Knapp, 2000;Diaconescu et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%