2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.197980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms for PRRSV Pathogenesis and Host Response to Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To successfully fight against PRRSV infection, macrophages have evolved various strategies to regulate antiviral responses, such as regulating the production of IFN-α/β [17]. The previous evidence suggested that PRRSV was susceptible to IFNs [18], whereas PRRSV-mediated suppression of IFNs production helped the virus circumvent the host antiviral responses [19]. Besides, the pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α mainly produced in PAMs after virus invasion, play critical roles in infection and pathogenesis of PRRSV [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To successfully fight against PRRSV infection, macrophages have evolved various strategies to regulate antiviral responses, such as regulating the production of IFN-α/β [17]. The previous evidence suggested that PRRSV was susceptible to IFNs [18], whereas PRRSV-mediated suppression of IFNs production helped the virus circumvent the host antiviral responses [19]. Besides, the pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α mainly produced in PAMs after virus invasion, play critical roles in infection and pathogenesis of PRRSV [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, as the previous studies have reported, low pathogenic PRRSV-like CHsx1401 enhanced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in PAMs and serum [ 40 ], which could inhibit infection of other pathogens through the activation of NF-КB pathway or STAT pathway [ 34 ]. Besides, upon the PRRSV infection, GLUT2 mRNA abundance and sucrase, maltase, and Na+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase activities in the intestines had increased, and the changed intestinal microenvironment might suppress PDCoV infection in the epithelial cells [ 41 , 42 ]. Additionally, PRRSV infection might inhibit the secretion of trypsin based on the fact that PRRSV infection could induce the occurrence of pancreatitis [ 43 ] and the reduced trypsin might down-regulate the expression levels of receptors for PDCoV entry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last stage is critically dependent on CD163, a scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) family for hemoglobin clearance, which is the most specific and indispensable receptor for PRRSV entry and infection both in vitro and in vivo [ 8 , 12 , 59 ]. Additionally, the viral GP2 and GP4 glycoproteins bind to CD163 [ 13 ]. Moreover, a study has shown that CD163 interacts with GP3 and GP5 in addition to the known interactions with GP4 and GP2, and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) analysis indicated that the SRCR5-domain deletion of CD163 loses its interaction with viral GP2, GP3, and GP5, and thus blocks virus uncoating in the early endosomes [ 17 ].…”
Section: The Process Of the Prrsv Entry And Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PRRSV is mainly divided into two genotypes: type 1 (represented by the European strain Lelystad Virus) and type 2 (represented by the North American strain VR-2332), and both PRRSV genotypes have only 50–60% nucleotide identity [ 6 , 13 ]. In addition to the genotype differences between PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2, the host immune responses have been shown to differ, sometimes considerably due to their biological differences including pathogenicity ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%