Article:Barr, A. orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-6412, Clarke, S.D., Petkovski, M. et al. (4 more authors) (2016) Effects of strain rate and moisture content on the behaviour of sand under one-dimensional compression. Experimental Mechanics, 56 (9). pp. 1625 -1639 . ISSN 1741 -2765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0200-z eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher's website.
TakedownIf you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.Experimental Mechanics manuscript No. Abstract The influence of strain rate and moisture content on the behaviour of a quartz sand was assessed using high-pressure quasi-static (10 −3 s −1 ) and high-strain-rate (10 3 s −1 ) experiments under uniaxial strain.Quasi-static compression to axial stresses of 800 MPa was carried out alongside split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiments to 400 MPa, where in each case lateral deformation of the specimen was prevented using a steel test box or ring, and lateral stresses were recorded. A significant increase in constrained modulus was observed between strain rates of 10 −3 s −1 and 10 3 s −1 , however a consistently lower Poisson's ratio in the dynamic tests minimised changes in bulk modulus. The reduction in Poisson's ratio suggests that the stiffening of the sand in the SHPB tests is due to additional inertial confinement rather than an inherent strain-rate dependence. In the quasi-static tests the specimens behaved less stiffly with increasing moisture content, while in the dynamic tests the addition of water had little effect on the overall stiffness, causing the quasi-static and dynamic series to diverge with increasing moisture content.