1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1994.tb00149.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mohs Micrographic Surgery Local Recurrences

Abstract: MMS local recurrences are rare with procedural errors representing a majority of them. Five-year cure rates for basal cell carcinoma may somewhat overestimate the ultimate cure rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is closer to that obtained with Mohs surgery, which is often below 2% (Tromovitch and Stegman, 1978;Robins, 1981;Robins et al, 1985;Roenigk et al, 1986;Rowe et al, 1989;Lawrence, 1993;Hruza, 1994). In contrast to radiotherapy, a histological appraisal of the efficiency of the treatment is possible with surgery.…”
Section: Failure Ratesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It is closer to that obtained with Mohs surgery, which is often below 2% (Tromovitch and Stegman, 1978;Robins, 1981;Robins et al, 1985;Roenigk et al, 1986;Rowe et al, 1989;Lawrence, 1993;Hruza, 1994). In contrast to radiotherapy, a histological appraisal of the efficiency of the treatment is possible with surgery.…”
Section: Failure Ratesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…9,10 Because of its accuracy in determining tumor-free margins, patients referred for MMS typically present with tumors that have a relatively higher statistical likelihood of local recurrence. Indications for MMS have been formulated based on studies [12][13][14] that tended to focus on a subset of risk factors for subclinical spread. Tumors were compared on the basis of one variable alone, for example, histologic type or anatomic location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Mohs micrographic surgery was performed on an outpatient basis under local anesthesia using the standard technique. 12,13,16 An average of 3-mm margins were taken for each layer.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slight technical problems are likely to greatly interfere in the accuracy of microscopic control of margins, and not always does a technician really understand the difficulty of the problem. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In the specific case of "disappearance of residual malignant cells" one of the alternatives below is likely to have happened: a) False positivity of the examination of surgical piece's margins. This depends on the multiple slicing incidences, incorrect inclusion of part of the surgical material -which might have detached from the main piece in this stage of specimen preparation -and also an initial wearing of the block until the technician collects the best slice to be put in the slide.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%