2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation transfer function and pupil size in multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in vitro

Abstract: With a zonal progressive multifocal IOL, the pupil size effected a trade-off between the far and near MTFs: The near MTF increased at the expense of the far MTF at large pupil sizes (effective pupil diameter >3.4 mm). To enhance near vision with a multifocal IOL, the desirable effective pupil diameter should be 3.4 mm or larger.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 This might be in line with in vitro studies testing multifocal IOLs, underlining that the aperture has a substantial impact on optical performance. 38,39 Clinical reports of the effect of pupil size on straylight after multifocal IOL implantation have not been published until now; thus, further studies are needed to determine its potential effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 This might be in line with in vitro studies testing multifocal IOLs, underlining that the aperture has a substantial impact on optical performance. 38,39 Clinical reports of the effect of pupil size on straylight after multifocal IOL implantation have not been published until now; thus, further studies are needed to determine its potential effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTF is considered effective for evaluating optical properties. In the past as well, Kawamorita and Uozato [17] have reported an evaluation of a monofocal IOL and Array, which is a refractive multifocal IOL. The evaluation that we performed did not contradict clinical results; therefore, we thought that MTF was effective in evaluating visual function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have measured through-focus retinal image quality, generally using double-pass imaging techniques (Artal, Marcos, Navarro, Miranda, & Ferro, 1995;Kawamorita & Uozato, 2005;Navarro, Ferro, Artal, & Miranda, 1993) or visual quality (Gupta, Naroo, & Wolffsohn, 2009;Maxwell, Lane, & Zhou, 2009;Schmidinger et al, 2006;Woods, Woods, & Fonn, 2015), these are generally restricted to patients implanted or fitted with commercial lenses, and therefore limited to specific conditions. Most of the systematic evaluations of many of the available lenses are limited to optical computer simulations and on bench experiments, therefore lacking from the optical and the neural complexity of a patient (Martin & Roorda, 2003).…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%