2016
DOI: 10.1109/lpt.2016.2574800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation Format Identification in Coherent Receivers Using Deep Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the proposed algorithm can also work for coherent optical systems and single-carrier modulation. We also compared the complexity of the proposed KNN algorithm with artificial neural network [13]. The complexity calculation of ANN [27,28] and KNN are listed in Table 2, in which the complexity calculation involves two parts, namely the training part and the prediction part.…”
Section: Experimental Verification and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that the proposed algorithm can also work for coherent optical systems and single-carrier modulation. We also compared the complexity of the proposed KNN algorithm with artificial neural network [13]. The complexity calculation of ANN [27,28] and KNN are listed in Table 2, in which the complexity calculation involves two parts, namely the training part and the prediction part.…”
Section: Experimental Verification and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several machine learning-based modulation format identification (MFI) techniques have been proposed both in digital coherent and directly detected receivers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] for optical communications systems because of their excellent learning ability from data, which can avoid the requirement of pre-information. Khan proposed a deep machine learning method to identify three modulation formats at an accuracy of 100% in a wide optical signal-to-noise ratio range [13]. A simple and cost-effective MFI technique was also proposed by his teams using an artificial neural network based on asynchronous amplitude histogram (AAH) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of autonomous modulation format identification in digital coherent receivers (i.e., without requiring information from the transmitter) has been addressed by means of a variety of ML algorithms, including k-means clustering [64] and neural networks [66], [67]. Papers [63] and [68] take advantage of the Stokes space signal representation (see Fig.…”
Section: Modulation Format Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, features extracted from asynchronous amplitude histograms sampled from the eye-diagram after equalization in digital coherent transceivers are used in [65]- [67] to train NNs. In [66], [67], a NN is used for hierarchical extraction of the amplitude histograms' features, in order to obtain a compressed representation, aimed at reducing the number of neurons in the hidden layers with respect to the number of features. In [65], a NN is combined with a genetic algorithm to improve the efficiency of the weight selection procedure during the training phase.…”
Section: Modulation Format Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coherent optical communications, a number of techniques have been proposed in the most recent years. For example, machine learning algorithms are applied to recognize signal's amplitude histograms [5] or the Stokes space-based signal representation [6]; however, they require either prior training or iterative processing. Image processing techniques like the connected component analysis are employed in [7] to classify the modulation format in the Stokes space domain, but such features are appropriate only for lower-order modulation formats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%