2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulating arithmetic fact retrieval: A single-blind, sham-controlled tDCS study with repeated fMRI measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a previous offline fMRI-tDCS study [38] also reported stimulation-specific fMRI results in the absence of behavioural effects. In the present study, we investigated for the first time the effects of tDCS on two types of arithmetic demands (facts and procedures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, a previous offline fMRI-tDCS study [38] also reported stimulation-specific fMRI results in the absence of behavioural effects. In the present study, we investigated for the first time the effects of tDCS on two types of arithmetic demands (facts and procedures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, having said that, future research must consider their potentially different neurofunctional signatures, examine potential side effects, and discuss neuroethical questions (Cohen Kadosh et al 2012;Davis 2014). Documentation of (individualized) task-specific brain activity will potentially allow for predictive adjustment of tES configurations and better evaluation thereof, i.e., using fMRI (Clemens et al 2013), EEG , or fNIRS (Snowball et al 2013). Further tES precision could be obtained from considering a neurodevelopmental perspective, relevant domain-related states, concurrent neuroimaging, and theoretical optimization of task-related brain structure correspondence in experimental and training studies to improve efficacy and replication (Harty et al 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, however, simplification or even standardization of certain parameters would facilitate cumulative research, and the ongoing development of electric field modeling tools can already be used for selecting stimulation targets (Truong et al 2014). Regarding numerical processes, stimulations should be administered concurrently to a task and could then achieve neurostructural precision following task-selective recruitment (Clemens et al 2013;Bikson and Rahman 2013), but effectivity can vary according to individual differences. Based on the available literature, so far, electrode sizes do not appear to produce remarkable effectivity differences in this domain.…”
Section: Tes Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to report that some were not able to find an effect of tDCS on behavioural performance (e.g., Clemens, Jung, Zvyagintsev, Domahs, & Willmes, 2013). However, Clemens et al (2013) showed that a single session of tDCS affected brain activation as indicated by the bloodoxygen-level-dependent signal.…”
Section: Higher Level Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%