2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Arithmetic Learning and Performance: A Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI Study

Abstract: BACKGROUND A small but increasing number of studies suggest that non-invasive brain stimulation by means of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate arithmetic processes that are essential for higher-order mathematical skills and that are impaired in dyscalculic individuals. However, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying such stimulation effects, and whether they are specific to cognitive processes involved in different arithmetic tasks. METHODS We addressed these questions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results, together with previously reported findings in PTSD patients, might suggest potential targets for both TMS and tES applications aimed at enhancing the therapeutic processes induced by psychotherapy. For instance, application of cathodal tDCS over the occipital lobe in PTSD patients might decrease local cortical excitability and modulate connectivity patterns (Callan et al, 2016; Hauser et al, 2016), and could be used to amplify the effect of each therapeutic session. Following the same logic, increase in excitability of prefrontal regions could be achieved by means of anodal tDCS, possibly increasing top-down control over subcortical regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results, together with previously reported findings in PTSD patients, might suggest potential targets for both TMS and tES applications aimed at enhancing the therapeutic processes induced by psychotherapy. For instance, application of cathodal tDCS over the occipital lobe in PTSD patients might decrease local cortical excitability and modulate connectivity patterns (Callan et al, 2016; Hauser et al, 2016), and could be used to amplify the effect of each therapeutic session. Following the same logic, increase in excitability of prefrontal regions could be achieved by means of anodal tDCS, possibly increasing top-down control over subcortical regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, tDCS paired with an n-back memory task reduced prefrontal oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR) (Choe et al, 2016). Yet, there is also evidence of increased alpha power (Choe et al, 2016), and BOLD response with anodal stimulation (Alekseichuk et al, 2016;Hauser et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most studies employed supraorbital or prefrontal return cathodes without necessarily highlighting potential effects on such domain-general functions. Interestingly, for novel and complex subtractions, left parietal tDCS prevented characteristic prefrontal deactivations below the right prefrontal cathode as captured with simultaneous fMRI (Hauser et al 2016) and this configuration improved reaction times (Hauser et al 2013). In another paradigm, after viewing an instructional video, administering a complex statistical procedure was enhanced from left parietal anodal tDCS with a temporal cathode (Houser et al 2015), but not with placement of a prefrontal cathode (Houser et al 2014).…”
Section: Arithmetic Performance Modulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%