2010
DOI: 10.1002/micr.20732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified retrograde‐flow medial plantar island flap for reconstruction of distal dorsal forefoot defects—Two case reports

Abstract: Soft tissue reconstruction of the distal forefoot and toes poses a difficult problem. Skin grafts are not suitable when deep structures are exposed. Local flaps are not available, particularly for defects of the toes. Free flaps are spared for larger defects. Medial plantar flap has been widely used for plantar defects, especially weight-bearing surface of the heel. Distally based retrograde-flow design of this flap allows the transfer of the pedicled flap distally and provides coverage of soft tissue over the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited reports have been published on the use of local flaps for forefoot coverage, such as the dorsal metatarsal V-Y advancement flap, reversed island flaps, reverse first dorsal metatarsal artery flap, distally based islanded dorsal flap, dorsal pedal neurocutaneous flap, retrograde-flow medial plantar island flap, reverse flow digital artery pedicle flap, and digital fillet flap (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). These flaps have the disadvantages of limited size and the requirement of a donor site, which is always impossible in traumatic foot injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited reports have been published on the use of local flaps for forefoot coverage, such as the dorsal metatarsal V-Y advancement flap, reversed island flaps, reverse first dorsal metatarsal artery flap, distally based islanded dorsal flap, dorsal pedal neurocutaneous flap, retrograde-flow medial plantar island flap, reverse flow digital artery pedicle flap, and digital fillet flap (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). These flaps have the disadvantages of limited size and the requirement of a donor site, which is always impossible in traumatic foot injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its use as a distally based island or rotation flap is supported in the literature. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] However, an intact vascular pedicle imposes restrictions on flap mobilization and coverage of large distal wounds. It also depends on intact vascular collaterals linking the dorsal and plantar vascular channels that may have been injured in inciting trauma 35 or iatrogenically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomic studies concerning the vascular supply of the medial aspect of the foot were performed to provide plastic surgeons with a new alternative for forefoot reconstruction [14,29,38,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%