2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02213.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection in relation to an immunohistochemical stain

Abstract: The MRU test had high sensitivity and specificity for moderate to severe H. pylori infection, but it may result in false-negative results in tests for mild infection. As the MRU test has the advantages of shorter incubation times and low cost, a combination of the MRU test and the Giemsa stain for touch cytology may be the most time- and cost-efficient tests in a clinical setting for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 In the present study, there was a significant correlation between the severity of gastritis and the presence of H. pylori infection on histology. Similar results were seen by Tokunaga et al 23 In the present study, a total of six cases (10.0%) showed the presence of lymphoid follicles in addition to chronic inflammation. However, the presence of lymphoid follicles did not correlate significantly with the presence of H. pylori as only 3 out of these 6 patients were positive for H. pylori.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…22 In the present study, there was a significant correlation between the severity of gastritis and the presence of H. pylori infection on histology. Similar results were seen by Tokunaga et al 23 In the present study, a total of six cases (10.0%) showed the presence of lymphoid follicles in addition to chronic inflammation. However, the presence of lymphoid follicles did not correlate significantly with the presence of H. pylori as only 3 out of these 6 patients were positive for H. pylori.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[39] found Giemsa to be positive in 78% patients and IHC in 89% and recommended Giemsa staining as a routine detection method. Similar results were obtained by Tokunaga et al[22]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The rapid urease test was found to be of less value in diagnosing H. pylori infection in our study with a sensitivity of 74.5% which is comparable to the findings of Tokunaga et al .,[22] Malik et al .,[23] and Ceken et al . [24] On the contrary, Calvet et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A limit to the urease test is the bacterial load necessary to obtain a sufficient sensitivity. A semiquantitative evaluation of the bacteria present by histology clearly showed that false-negative urease tests corresponded to the lowest histological scores for H. pylori (38,522,597). It seems that at least 10 5 bacteria are necessary for a valid result.…”
Section: Urease Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%