2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-021-00403-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified dynamic boundary conditions (mDBC) for general-purpose smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): application to tank sloshing, dam break and fish pass problems

Abstract: Dynamic boundary conditions (DBC) for solid surfaces are standard in the weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code DualSPHysics. A stationary solid is simply represented by fixed particles with pressure from the equation of state. Boundaries are easy to set up and computations are relatively stable and efficient, providing robust numerical simulation for complex geometries. However, a small unphysical gap between the fluid and solid boundaries can form, decreasing the accuracy of pressures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way is to distribute particles on wall surfaces to complete the kernel support near the boundary, which is the most popular method in the present SPH community. For example, the technique named Fixed Ghost Particle proposed by Adami et al [121] was adopted in SPHinXsys or Dynamic Boundary Condition by Crespo et al [122,123] in DualSPHysics. Another method is based on the normal-flux method that discretizes physical walls into several segments, i.e., line elements in 2D and triangle elements in 3D; this method was adopted by several commercial SPH packages, such as Nextflow Software [115] and Dive Solution [124].…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way is to distribute particles on wall surfaces to complete the kernel support near the boundary, which is the most popular method in the present SPH community. For example, the technique named Fixed Ghost Particle proposed by Adami et al [121] was adopted in SPHinXsys or Dynamic Boundary Condition by Crespo et al [122,123] in DualSPHysics. Another method is based on the normal-flux method that discretizes physical walls into several segments, i.e., line elements in 2D and triangle elements in 3D; this method was adopted by several commercial SPH packages, such as Nextflow Software [115] and Dive Solution [124].…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance this formulation, a new boundary method has been developed: the modified dynamic boundary conditions (mDBC) [53]. In this method, the density of solid particles, arranged in the same way as in the original DBC, is obtained from ghost positions within the fluid domain by linear extrapolation.…”
Section: Boundary Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using DBC, an unphysical gap between the fluid and the solid boundaries appears, lowering the accuracy of the pressure prediction at the boundaries. To alleviate this, a second approach called modified dynamic boundary conditions (mDBC) has recently been added [30], with the density of boundary particles obtained from "ghost nodes" cleverly positioned within the fluid domain.…”
Section: Dualsphysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial focus for applications with DualSPHysics has been on wave generation [24,25] and its interaction with coastal structures with good results [26,27]. However, this code has then been applied successfully to hydraulic problems such as runoff on sloping terrain [28], dam safety [29], fish passage constructions [14,30], added mass and damping coefficient [31], and drag coefficient analysis in channels [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%