“…In several other characters listed by Olson & Feduccia (1980a), the traditional groupings represent erroneous, oversimplified, or nonhomologous classes of charactcrs, and the characters were rejected as uninformative or for which comprehensive rcanalysis was beyond the scope of this study: 'types' of intestinal convolutions (Gadow, 1879a(Gadow, , b, 1889Beddard, 191 I); variation in the liver or duodenum (Crisp, 1864;Mitchell, 1901); perforation of nostrils, whether in reference to a complete septum nasi osseum or operculum nasi integumentum (Van Tyne & Berger, 1976: PRESBIDRVIS AND BASAL ANSERIFORMES 37 1 Clark, 1993a); presence of an ingluvies or 'crop' (Gadow, 1879a, b;Swenander, 1902;Niethammer, 1933); 'type' of syrinx (Beddard, 1898;King, 1989King, , 1993; and patterns of carotid arteries (Garrod, 1873b;Glenny, 1955). Characters of the glandula uropygialis were excluded because these were polymorphic in most or all of the surveyed taxonomic groups (Johnston, 1988).…”