2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13726-015-0395-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of flax fiber surface and its compatibilization in polylactic acid/flax composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flexural properties provide an indirect idea regarding interfacial and stiffness properties of composites [36]. Due to providing reduced pressure resulting in fracture or significant crack in composites leading to failure for less interfacial adhesion among fiber and reinforcement polymer [37]. Effect of flexural bending strength and modulus (MPa) of treated and untreated fibers mass contents of 30%, 40%, and 50% reinforced PLA biocomposites displayed in Figure 3.…”
Section: Flexural Strength and Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexural properties provide an indirect idea regarding interfacial and stiffness properties of composites [36]. Due to providing reduced pressure resulting in fracture or significant crack in composites leading to failure for less interfacial adhesion among fiber and reinforcement polymer [37]. Effect of flexural bending strength and modulus (MPa) of treated and untreated fibers mass contents of 30%, 40%, and 50% reinforced PLA biocomposites displayed in Figure 3.…”
Section: Flexural Strength and Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its applications are limited by its slow crystallization speed and brittleness to some extent [3][4][5][6]. To overcome these disadvantages of PLA, many studies have shown that adding natural fiber such as flax, hemp, jute, and sisal is an effective, useful method to reinforce PLA [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to improve the interfacial bonding between polymer and natural fiber, a lot of treatments are made to modify the surface of the fiber such as alkali, bleaching, acetylation, and steaming. Alkali treatment is one of most widely used methods [10,[15][16][17][18][19]. In this process, the lignin, hemicelluloses, pectin, and other impurities in the fiber are dissolved, and the molecular orientation is improved due to a reduction of the rotation angle of the microfibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with DG1, the peak height of DG6 increased at 3427 cm − 1 , indicating an increase in hydrogen-bonded association -OH with cellulose, meaning an increase in the fiber water absorption. e main reasons for the increase of water absorption of the DG6 fiber are as follows: NaOH solution hydrolyzes the waxy layer on the surface of straw fibers into higher fatty acids and higher fatty alcohols and then destroys the waxy layer on the surface [50,51]; when the metal hydrated ions in the NaOH solution enter the cellulose and interact with hydrogen bonds on the cellulose chain, it destroys some crystalline region of cellulose, decreasing the crystallinity of cellulose [52,53]. On the other hand, the absorption peak of DG6 sees a significant increase at 2918 cm − 1 corresponding to DG1, but disappears at 1516 cm − 1 and 1242 cm − 1 and diminishes at 1057 cm − 1 , indicating that the content of cellulose increased, the content of lignin decreased, and the crystallinity of the fibers increased after modification with the NaOH solution.…”
Section: Effect Of Modification Methods On Chemical Structure Of Stramentioning
confidence: 99%