2005
DOI: 10.1177/0096144205279202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modernist Civic Space and the Case of Brasília

Abstract: Is architectural modernism necessarily hostile to civic life? Or can it be said to produce civic life in new terms? This article explores the experience of the civic realm of the modernist city with regard to Brasilia, the new capital of Brazil and by far the largest city built on modernist lines. Designed by Lúcio Costa and Oscar Niemeyer in the 1950s, and inaugurated to international acclaim in 1960, it subsequently came to represent an authoritarian and inflexible urbanism that for residents was profoundly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the modernist capital designed under the egalitarian inspiration of Lucio Costa and oscar Niemeyer would subsequently come to represent an authoritarian and inflexible urbanism that proves so alienating to most of its own residents (Williams, 2005). These contradictions continue to haunt Brazilian society and the achievements of national development policies to this day, which only reinforce the relevance of excavating the origin and the legacy of national-developmentalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the modernist capital designed under the egalitarian inspiration of Lucio Costa and oscar Niemeyer would subsequently come to represent an authoritarian and inflexible urbanism that proves so alienating to most of its own residents (Williams, 2005). These contradictions continue to haunt Brazilian society and the achievements of national development policies to this day, which only reinforce the relevance of excavating the origin and the legacy of national-developmentalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De literatuur over modernistische architectuur en stedenbouw, evenals de sociaalwetenschappelijke kritieken erop, richten zich vooral op de fysieke ruimte van de wijken, de architectonische en stedenbouwkundige concepties die eraan ten grondslag liggen en de (vaak veronderstelde, soms empirisch aangetoonde) effecten op menselijk gedrag en perceptie. Deze kritieken zijn bovendien veelal geformuleerd vanuit het elitaire standpunt van 'experts' en buitenstaanders: architecten, cineasten, journalisten, wetenschappers en romanciers (Williams 2005).…”
Section: Tocunclassified
“…As Mariusz Czepczyriski noted: "One of the main fundaments of socialist architecture was the will to change society by or through, architecture, design and cultural landscape" (2008,63). Although differing in core beliefs, the motivations and assumptions animating socialist urbanism were not terribly dissimilar from those driving the creation of new urban spaces in non-democratic contexts like Nazi Nuremberg or Fascist Rome (Hagen and Ostergren 2014;Kirk 2006), democratic contexts like Washington D.C. or post-Cold War Berlin (Butler 2007;Molnar 2010), colonial contexts like French Fez or British New Delhi (Holden 2006;Johnson 2010), and postcolonial contexts like Lagos or Brasilia (Immerwahr 2007;Williams 2005).…”
Section: Building Socialist Places and Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%