1969
DOI: 10.1136/jramc-115-04-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Weapons and the Human Ear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was large individual variation in susceptibility to impulse noise in both groups. This phenomenon is similar to that Brasher found in army soldiers who were shooting with assault rifles with no hearing protection (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There was large individual variation in susceptibility to impulse noise in both groups. This phenomenon is similar to that Brasher found in army soldiers who were shooting with assault rifles with no hearing protection (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It has been suggested that personnel may be dissuaded from wearing PHP for fear of being seen as ‘sissy or effeminate’,14 but such a simplistic viewpoint was conjectural and is outdated. At one time it was assumed that soldiers on sentry duty or on patrol in hostile territory would be at risk of injury in an ambush were they not able to hear a warning sign such as the snapping of a twig, rustling of leaves or the movement of a stone; these sound signs, however, suggest the enemy is far too close.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was feared that due to the immensity of the exposure, large numbers of soldiers could have had a significant hearing loss, especially as previous studies by Brasher 4 and Coombe 15 had shown that as many as 50% of all individuals can be sensitive to impulse noise. The results, therefore, are gratifying in that the large majority of those tested and exposed are still within the acceptable limits of HI and H2 and no restrictions need be placed on their employment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%