2018
DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern postoperative monitoring of free flaps

Abstract: More research with practical and clinically relevant parameters, that is flap salvage rate, false positive rate and cost-efficiency are needed before objective comparisons between different monitoring techniques can be made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Kääriäinen et al, such a method should be repeatable, reliable, recordable, rapidly responsive, accurate, inexpensive, and applicable to all kinds of flaps. 19 For this reason, a broad range of objective methods have been introduced but, however, none of the aforementioned methods have yet been applied systematically to the best of our knowledge. In a recent review, Li et al attribute this to high procedural costs, methodological complexity, low sensitivity, and high false positive as well as false negative rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kääriäinen et al, such a method should be repeatable, reliable, recordable, rapidly responsive, accurate, inexpensive, and applicable to all kinds of flaps. 19 For this reason, a broad range of objective methods have been introduced but, however, none of the aforementioned methods have yet been applied systematically to the best of our knowledge. In a recent review, Li et al attribute this to high procedural costs, methodological complexity, low sensitivity, and high false positive as well as false negative rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure rate in reconstructive surgery with bone free flaps (11-25%, depending on the study) is higher than that with muscle, fasciocutaneous, or cutaneous flaps (1-17%) (Benacquista, Kasabian, & Karp, 1996;Bui et al, 2007;Ferguson Jr & Yu, 2009;Jallali, Ridha, & Butler, 2005). Over the past 15 years, several monitoring methods for head and neck reconstructive surgery have therefore been developed: implantable Doppler, color duplex sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, laser Doppler flowmetry, and microdialysis (Abdel-Galil & Mitchell, 2009;Hölzle et al, 2010;Kääriäinen, Halme, & Laranne, 2018). At present, many surgeons consider that microdialysis (initially developed by Delgado, DeFeudis, Roth, Ryugo, and Mitruka (1972)) is a reliable monitoring method for buried free flaps and can detect flap compromise early (Brix, Muret, Ricbourg, & Humbert, 2006;Frost et al, 2015;Jyränki, Suominen, Vuola, & Bäck, 2006;Nielsen, Gutberg, & Birke-Sørensen, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other systems for superficial assessment are near-infrared spectroscopy and thermography. [59][60][61] The other principle is to measure blood flow directly on the anastomosed vessels. Since this value represents the total blood flow in the flap, it gives a very good estimation of the viability of the flap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantable systems offer continuous evaluation of the blood flow, but require a second procedure to remove the implanted probe. [61][62][63][64][65] Using laser to assess microcirculation in the skin A laser is a device that generates an intense beam of coherent monochromatic light (or other electromagnetic radiation) by stimulated emission of photons from excited atoms or molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%