Modern Politics and Government

Ball, Alan R.

doi:10.1007/978-1-349-19347-9

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Experts have defined many organizations depending on their point of view or focus of attention. Robbins argues that an organization is a socially conscious entity, with a relatively identifiable boundary, that functions are generally continuous basis to achieve a common goal or set of goals [1]. The organization was mentioned by Pfiffner and Presthus as 'the structuring of individuals and functions into productive relationships.…”

Section: A Organizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the perspective of organizational theory, there are ambiguities and inconsistencies among them regarding the provisions of Article 75 paragraph (3) which states that Provincial KPU and Regency / City KPU are authorized to determine "decisions" based on KPU rules and decisions. The authority of the KPU to form KPU regulations and KPU's decisions is regulated in Article 75 (1). In other words, the Provincial KPU and Regency / City KPU are not authorized to form regulations but only form decisions in carrying out their duties and authorities as stipulated in Article 75 Paragraph (3).…”

Section: Advances In Social Science Education and Humanities Researcmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Organizational Dimensional Settings General Election Commissions in the 2017 Indonesian Law Number 7 on the Election

Sudrajat¹,

Hersusetyati²,

Paramarta³

2019

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The existence of organizations is very important in the administration of elections. Setting various organizational dimensions adequately, is an important part of efforts to achieve organizational goals. Indonesian Law No.7 of 2017 concerning Elections, which replaces the three laws related to the election before was a dynamic effort towards an increasingly quality election. In this law, it is stipulated that the KPU is one of the organizations that organizes elections. The existence of various KPU organizational dimensions, both structural and contextual, in the law is one of the determinant factors for the effectiveness of achieving the KPU's objectives as an organization. With normative juridical research methods and library studies, this study concludes that Indonesian Law No. 7 of 2017 has included the arrangement of organizational dimensions, both structural and contextual dimensions. The structural dimensions include formalization, specialization, centralization, hierarchy of authority, standardization, complexity, professionalism, while the contextual dimensions include size, technology, goals, strategies and organizational culture and organizational environment. There are four dimensions of the organization that are fully regulated in the law, namely formalization, specialization, standardization, organization environment, organizational technology. The other dimensions are centralized, complexity, professionalism, size, environment and goals, strategies and organizational culture are not adequately regulated. There are several inconsistencies and obscurity in the arrangement, so this law needs to be revised including regarding the nature of the institution, the authority to make regulations, the minimum education requirements and the age of the election organizer.

show abstract

Section: A Organizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Advances In Social Science Education and Humanities Researcmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Organizational Dimensional Settings General Election Commissions in the 2017 Indonesian Law Number 7 on the Election

Sudrajat¹,

Hersusetyati²,

Paramarta³

2019

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As direct democracy is not practical in modern states, representative democracy has become the dominant and most practical form of government in the Western world. Ball and Peters (2000) noted three characteristics of liberal democratic theories of representation. Firstly, the emphasis is on the importance of individual rights.…”

Section: An Evaluation Of the Political Accountability System In Hongmentioning

confidence: 99%

Political Accountability in Hong Kong: Myth or Reality?

Lam

2009

Aust J Public Adm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article assesses the practice of political accountability in Hong Kong: whether it has largely been realised in practice, or whether it is merely a political slogan for the government to justify its executive-led governance. The analysis begins with a review of the theoretical concepts of political accountability and ministerial accountability, and then establishes an operational framework to analyse the current practice of political accountability in Hong Kong's political system. It concludes by addressing the degree of political accountability overall.

show abstract

“…Öyle ki çoğu modern mecliste -parlamentonun baskın mı, yürütme organına yardımcı mı olacağına dair-güç paylaşımının anahtarı, meclisin içindeki siyasi parti sistemindedir. Dolayısıyla siyasi partilerin parlamento içerisinde sahip oldukları yetkiler ve görevler yürütme üzerindeki yasama denetiminin derecesini belirler ve meclis faaliyetlerini etkiler 12 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Parlamenter Denetim Aracı Olarak İnsan Haklarını İnceleme Komisyonu

Boyar

Çinarli

2020

Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

İnsan Haklarını İnceleme Komisyonu, “insan hakları ihlallerini uluslararası taahhütlere uygun olarak önlemek” gerekçesiyle 1990 yılında kurulmuştur. Komisyon; resen araştırmalarıyla insan hakları alanındaki tüm gelişmeleri takip eder, insan haklarının ihlal edildiği iddiasıyla kendisine yapılan bireysel başvuruları sonuçlandırır, insan hakları alanında iç hukukta yapılması gereken yasal düzenlemeleri önerir, kendisine sevk edilen kanun tekliflerini görüşür ve kendisinden diğer komisyonlarca istenen konularda görüş bildirir. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Komisyon tarafından çalışmalarının neticeleri hakkında hazırlanan raporu görüşerek bilgi edinir. Böylece insan hakları alanında üzerine düşen görevler ve alınması gereken önlemlerle ilgili fikir sahibi olur. Gerek görürse, komisyon raporları kapsamında yürütme organına karşı anayasal denetim araçlarını kullanır ve kamuoyunun dikkatini bu raporlara çeker. Buna ek olarak, mevzuat kaynaklı yeni ihlalleri önlemek adına, Komisyonun kanun teklifleri hakkındaki görüşlerinden yararlanır.

show abstract

Modern Politics and Government

Cited by 15 publications

References 0 publications

Analysis of Organizational Dimensional Settings General Election Commissions in the 2017 Indonesian Law Number 7 on the Election

Analysis of Organizational Dimensional Settings General Election Commissions in the 2017 Indonesian Law Number 7 on the Election

Political Accountability in Hong Kong: Myth or Reality?

Parlamenter Denetim Aracı Olarak İnsan Haklarını İnceleme Komisyonu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About