2007
DOI: 10.1093/jat/31.5.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Instrumental Methods in Forensic Toxicology

Abstract: This article reviews modern analytical instrumentation in forensic toxicology for identification and quantification of drugs and toxins in biological fluids and tissues. A brief description of the theory and inherent strengths and limitations of each methodology is included. The focus is on new technologies that address current analytical limitations. A goal of this review is to encourage innovations to improve our technological capabilities and to encourage use of these analytical techniques in forensic toxic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of ITMS are connected to its ability to examine various ions with an improved sensitivity (Smith et al, 2007).…”
Section: Forensic Toxicology-the Field Of Nobel Prize Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The advantages of ITMS are connected to its ability to examine various ions with an improved sensitivity (Smith et al, 2007).…”
Section: Forensic Toxicology-the Field Of Nobel Prize Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen years later, in 2002, John Fenn and Koicki Tanaka won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for electrospray ionization, applied in forensic field in the LC-MS technology, which lead to an improvement and the widening of its application (Smith et al, 2007). LC technology is based on dissolution of the analytes and their separation based on differences in solubility between the two phases: mobile (liquid) and stationary (small solid particles).…”
Section: Forensic Toxicology-the Field Of Nobel Prize Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations