2011
DOI: 10.1108/17511341111099583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern innovation management theory and the evolving US lighting industry

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to use a series of disruptive innovations in the 150‐year history of the US lighting industry to test whether two key innovation management theories retain their explanatory power as market structures change.Design/methodology/approachHistorical case studies of four successive disruptive lighting innovations are used: incandescent light bulbs, fluorescent light bulbs, compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFBs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). Descriptions of each innovation inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are a number of event theories, perhaps the best known is 27 Early entry, capabilities and shakeout based on the emergence of a dominant design, in which the consumer favors one design that becomes the industry standard (Suarez and Utterback, 1995;Utterback and Suarez, 1993). This design may come from an incumbent, or a new entrant, which gains a toe-hold in the industry through innovation, as aptly described in Unger's (2011) study of the US lighting industry. Entry slows because opportunities to enter the industry based on new product designs are extinguished, and the installed base of the dominant design grows.…”
Section: Industry Life Cycle and Firm Shakeoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are a number of event theories, perhaps the best known is 27 Early entry, capabilities and shakeout based on the emergence of a dominant design, in which the consumer favors one design that becomes the industry standard (Suarez and Utterback, 1995;Utterback and Suarez, 1993). This design may come from an incumbent, or a new entrant, which gains a toe-hold in the industry through innovation, as aptly described in Unger's (2011) study of the US lighting industry. Entry slows because opportunities to enter the industry based on new product designs are extinguished, and the installed base of the dominant design grows.…”
Section: Industry Life Cycle and Firm Shakeoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unger (2011) notes that absorptive capacity, the ability of a firm to recognise the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends may be key to the ability of companies to innovate and capture new technologies. He also points to a second theory that maintains disruptive innovations can provide toeholds for small companies, even those without great absorptive capacity.…”
Section: Implications For Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The innovation champion responsible for scaling-up the multiple parts of moving and operating a circus through contributions that were transformative was William C. Coup. Management innovation is an evolving topic in management scholarship. Some historybased analyses address innovation at the institution or organizational level (Unger, 2011) but we focus on the individual champion where there has been less development. Although there is some agreement on how individual managers influence innovation in their organizations, the research on what are the characteristics of managers that cause them to be innovation champions is still evolving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%