Modern Concepts and Archetypes of the Management in Education: Psychological, Social and Economical Aspects

Kassymova, Gulzhaina K.; Лавриненко, С. В.; Kraynova, E. R.; Gasanova, R. R.; Kamenskaya, E. N.; Kosov, A. V.; Arpentieva, М. R.; Gorelova, Irina

doi:10.32014/2020.2518-1467.59

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The third issue is education management. Currently, it can be implemented at the intersection of two models: partial preservation of the sole management of educational institutions and their structures, along with the activation of the mechanisms of "direct democracy", "evergetics" or intersubjective management (joint solution of problems urgent for actors) (Arpentieva, 2016;Arpentieva et al, 2019;Kassymova et al, 2020;Magoroh, 1963).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Landmarks and Choices of Modern Russian Education

Golubchikova

Kharchenko

Golubchikov

et al. 2021

ASPEN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Education is one of the movements of a person towards self-realization as a biological and cultural being. The dialectic of these "pillars" of his being forms tasks at a specific stage of individual, group and human development. At the same time, two ways of understanding can be distinguished as two ways of connecting, paths, between oppositions: "inversion" and "mediation". Inversion is the logic of non-reflective throwing between the poles-absolutes, ignoring the meaning-forming "middle". It is very typical for Russian culture. Mediation is the logic of creative search, finding and realizing a new meaning between the poles, not typical for Russian culture. Inversion creates a "historical trap" of adaptation to the split, the collapse of culture, into which Russia has fallen for centuries of almost total ignorance of some and the arbitrariness of others.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Landmarks and Choices of Modern Russian Education

Golubchikova

Kharchenko

Golubchikov

et al. 2021

ASPEN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, we used the cross-correlation analysis of the EEG, which makes it possible, first of all, to determine the connections between different sections of the brain, that is, to trace the work of the latter in dynamics An important part of our research was also the analysis of mythological and archetypical structures reflecting the functioning of certain types of individuals, including those who demonstrate Icarus syndrome. On the whole, there are few such studies: both abroad and, especially, in post-Soviet countries, they are rare (Arpentieva, 2018;Gorelova & Arpentieva, 2018;Green et al, 2019;Kassymova et al, 2020;Kendal et al, 2018;McAdams & Reischer, 2019;Roubekas & Ryba, 2020;Uchiyama & Muthukrishna, 2019). It should be mentioned some linguisticoriented studies, particularly the work of Anisimov (Anisimov, 1991) and the works of Makovsky (Makovsky, 2012;Makovsky, 2013;Makovsky, 2014a;Makovsky, 2014b;Makovsky, 2018) Anisimov's work deals with the algorithmic analysis of myth structure, mythological thinking and archetypes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identity Integration Disorder as a Promising Model for the Study from the Standpoint of Evolutionary Diatropics

Badalov

Sorokin

Fesenko³

et al. 2021

ASPEN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diatropics is an evolutionary theory of diversity and the mechanisms of its formation. Identity integration disorder (IID) is a specific mixed form of psychopathological diathesis, characterized by the presence in the personality structure of a combination of symptoms of the three main circles of mental disorders: schizophrenic, epileptic, affective. Our study evaluated the peculiarities of the neurophysiological indices of the brain of persons with IID as consolidating with respect to the main forms of mental disorders, to substantiate the possibility of studying this phenomenon as a diatropic model of mental pathology. A total of 76 subjects with IID and 20 mentally healthy subjects were selected. For neurophysiological examination, cross-correlation analysis of electroencephalography respondents was used. The changes in the connections between the different brain regions of individuals with IID can be described as indicating two main features: 1) a decrease in the degree of interaction between centrally localized structures - the temporal, and upper parietal; 2) an increase in the degree of interaction between the integration of the frontal and occipital regions. The presence of signs of mental disorders in the human population is necessary in order to form a special group of highly intelligent, creatively gifted.

show abstract

“…In modern education, there is an active search for new learning technologies and learning management. At the same time, many questions are related to the discussion about the place and role of digital learning in the general education system (Arpentieva et al, 2020;Badalov et al, 2020;Kassymova, Gimazov et al, 2020;Kassymova, Lavrinenko et al, 2020;Kenzhaliyev et al, 2020;Triyono et al, 2020;Tyumaseva et al, 2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Learning And Cognitive Development

Arpentieva¹

2020

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern Concepts and Archetypes of the Management in Education: Psychological, Social and Economical Aspects

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Landmarks and Choices of Modern Russian Education

Landmarks and Choices of Modern Russian Education

Identity Integration Disorder as a Promising Model for the Study from the Standpoint of Evolutionary Diatropics

E-Learning And Cognitive Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About