2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1266299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of epidemics: when contact repetition and clustering should be included

Abstract: Background: The spread of infectious disease is determined by biological factors, e.g. the duration of the infectious period, and social factors, e.g. the arrangement of potentially contagious contacts. Repetitiveness and clustering of contacts are known to be relevant factors influencing the transmission of droplet or contact transmitted diseases. However, we do not yet completely know under what conditions repetitiveness and clustering should be included for realistically modelling disease spread.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once two persons are identified to have contact, and one of them is contagious and the other is susceptible, there is a probability of an infection. For this, we use the mechanical model by Smieszek [60, 71]: Infected persons generate a “viral load” that they exhale, cough or sneeze into the environment, and people close by are exposed. Overall, the probability for person n to become infected by this process in a time step t is described as where m is a sum over all other persons, sh is the shedding rate (∼ microbial load), ci the contact intensity, in the intake (reduced, e.g., by a mask), τ the duration of interaction between the two individuals, and Θ a calibration parameter.…”
Section: Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once two persons are identified to have contact, and one of them is contagious and the other is susceptible, there is a probability of an infection. For this, we use the mechanical model by Smieszek [60, 71]: Infected persons generate a “viral load” that they exhale, cough or sneeze into the environment, and people close by are exposed. Overall, the probability for person n to become infected by this process in a time step t is described as where m is a sum over all other persons, sh is the shedding rate (∼ microbial load), ci the contact intensity, in the intake (reduced, e.g., by a mask), τ the duration of interaction between the two individuals, and Θ a calibration parameter.…”
Section: Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we include the effects of public transport. Finally, we include a mechanistic infection model, taken from Smieszek (2010). Ferguson et al (2020) do not describe their microscopic infection model in that paper; we cannot tell if the reported so-called “R” values (= reinfection values) are model input or model output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present paper goes beyond the above-mentioned studies (Smieszek 2010; Hackl and Dubernet 2019) in the following aspects:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation