2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijbge.2009.023332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of an individual decision-making process related to ethical issues in business: the risk of framing effects

Abstract: The theoretical paper at hand reviews sixteen most often cited descriptive models of a manager's individual decision making process related to ethical issues in business in general, international business and marketing fields in particular. The paper has a goal to point out the need to rephrase the dependent variable in the models in neutral terms to avoid framing effects in the three subject areas, as well as to rename the models accordingly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some noteworthy arguments about the wording of the dependent variable in the model that examine "ethical decision-making". Vigil (2009) raise an argument in her paper that "rather than wording the dependent variable as "ethical/unethical behavior/judgment" or as "ethical behavior/judgment," or "unethical behavior/judgment," the dependent variable in these models throughout the three subject areas should be "behavior/judgment," while "ethical aspects" should be treated as one of many dimensions of both the process and its outcomes. By framing the dependent variable in a dichotomous way, the authors of the models assume that decisions, behaviours or judgments are only either ethical or unethical.…”
Section: Survey Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some noteworthy arguments about the wording of the dependent variable in the model that examine "ethical decision-making". Vigil (2009) raise an argument in her paper that "rather than wording the dependent variable as "ethical/unethical behavior/judgment" or as "ethical behavior/judgment," or "unethical behavior/judgment," the dependent variable in these models throughout the three subject areas should be "behavior/judgment," while "ethical aspects" should be treated as one of many dimensions of both the process and its outcomes. By framing the dependent variable in a dichotomous way, the authors of the models assume that decisions, behaviours or judgments are only either ethical or unethical.…”
Section: Survey Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Kliukinskaite Vigil (2009) points out that "rather than wording the dependent variable as 'ethical/unethical decision/behavior/judgement' or as 'ethical decision/behaviour/ judgement', or 'unethical decision/behaviour/judgement', the dependent variable in these models throughout the three subject areas should be 'decision/behaviour/judgement' and the models showing how decisions carrying an ethical content should be called as 'decisionmaking models related to ethical issues'". Considering the above-stated arguments and suggestions, it is decided to word the dependent variable as "decision-making behaviour related to ethical issues" in this study.…”
Section: Decision-making Behaviour Related To Ethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…issues that lead to ethical dilemmas) of individuals in marketing organizations, which is a causal study in nature. Further, Kliukinskaite Vigil (2009) mentions:…”
Section: Ethical Philosophy In Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kliukinskaite Vigil (2009) denotes that: rather than wording the dependent variable as "ethical/unethical behaviour/judgment" or as "ethical behaviour/judgment," or "unethical behaviour/judgment," the dependent variable in these models throughout the three subject areas should be "behaviour/judgment," while "ethical aspects" should be treated as one of many dimensions of both the process and its outcomes. By framing the dependent variable in a dichotomous way, the authors of the models assume that decisions, behaviours or judgments are only either ethical or unethical.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%