Electromagnetic Waves 2011
DOI: 10.5772/19318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for Scattering from Rough Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the basic assumption of the KA method [21,22], the plane-boundary reflection occurs at every point on the randomly underlying rough surface, so there is only small section of rough surface whose local specular reflection can incident on the target with consideration of the statistical properties of the rough surface. For the moderate underlying rough surface, a small section of rough surface toward the target in the specular direction of the mean plane and a small surface portion directly under the target is only needed to take account of the surface scattering from the underlying rough surface to the target, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the basic assumption of the KA method [21,22], the plane-boundary reflection occurs at every point on the randomly underlying rough surface, so there is only small section of rough surface whose local specular reflection can incident on the target with consideration of the statistical properties of the rough surface. For the moderate underlying rough surface, a small section of rough surface toward the target in the specular direction of the mean plane and a small surface portion directly under the target is only needed to take account of the surface scattering from the underlying rough surface to the target, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPM is only valid for relatively smooth surfaces, where the roughness should satisfy the conditions k 0 σ h < 0.3 and √ 2σ h /l c < 0.3 [28]. With this restriction of the SPM model, the parameters set for the surface roughness were σ h = 0.002 m and l c = 0.02 m. Compared with roughness measurements of experimentally grown sea ice [29,30], the chosen parameters were within the reasonable range.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fem With Spm For Homogeneous Sea Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When taking account of the scattering contribution from the rough surface towards the target, it is unnecessary to consider the contribution of the whole length of the rough surface, but only the rough surface near the target, for lots of rough surface scattering cannot incident on the target. According to the KA [21,24], the bistatic scattering from the moderate underlying rough surface is dominated in the specular direction of the mean plane, so a small section of rough surface toward the target in that direction, which is taken as L1: {x ∈ (−g/2, sin θ i (h/ cos θ i − 1.5r tan θ i − 1.5r/ tan θ i ))} as shown in Figure 2, is only needed to take account of the secondary scattering contribution driven by the tapered wave from the underlying rough surface to the target. Taking the scattering from the target as an incident wave to the underlying rough surface, because the moderate underlying rough surface is random and is created by Monte Carlo realization, there is only small section of rough surface whose local specular reflection has some chance to incident on the target.…”
Section: Truncation Of the Underlying Rough Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitute the Equation (28) into (21), the integral equations can be converted into a set of equations of the induced electric current J o and magnetic current K o on the target surface…”
Section: Truncation Of the Underlying Rough Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation