1999
DOI: 10.1080/095851999340297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for comparative analysis of culture: the case of Poland

Abstract: This paper examines the main theoretical frameworks for analysis of comparative cultural attitudes. A critical discussion of the work by Kluckholm and Strodtbeck, Hofstede and Trompenaars leads to a new theoretical approach for study of the national cultural attitudes and norms of behaviour. A methodology based on action research is designed to compare the 'internalised' norms of behaviour with the 'perceived' norms. Two different but complementary techniques are applied to a small sample of Polish students to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that 'the subculture of organization reflects national culture, professional subculture, and the organization's own history' appears to be crucial for this research (ibid). Therefore, potential disparities should be visible, amongst others, in distribution of power, decision-making processes, extent of control (musicians vs. managers), objectives and rewards (artistic integrity vs. money), motivations to comply with organisational' rules (musicians are frequently individuals that lack of group skills), the importance of pressure groups and labour unions and the (Todeva, 1996;Nasierowski and Mikula, 1998;Hofstede, 2001;Kolman et al, 2003). Particularly apparent dissimilarities appear in the criteria that are crucial for the implementation of free market (which is a relatively new phenomena in Poland compared to the UK).…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that 'the subculture of organization reflects national culture, professional subculture, and the organization's own history' appears to be crucial for this research (ibid). Therefore, potential disparities should be visible, amongst others, in distribution of power, decision-making processes, extent of control (musicians vs. managers), objectives and rewards (artistic integrity vs. money), motivations to comply with organisational' rules (musicians are frequently individuals that lack of group skills), the importance of pressure groups and labour unions and the (Todeva, 1996;Nasierowski and Mikula, 1998;Hofstede, 2001;Kolman et al, 2003). Particularly apparent dissimilarities appear in the criteria that are crucial for the implementation of free market (which is a relatively new phenomena in Poland compared to the UK).…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dreachslin and Saunders (1999) and Ivancevich and Gilbert (2000) have drawn attention also to methodological issues. These authors would like to see more research on how people actually behave, rather than what they report they do or would behave, more longitudinal and qualitative analyses of diversity and diversity management, and more comparative research (see also Todeva, 1999). Finally, some scholars have focused on developing measures of diversity.…”
Section: Looking Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, many people are willing to shed either legacy to adapt Western culture, or what is received of it through the media, business contacts and tourists. Thus, culture is unusually unstable and shows considerable discrepancies between the cultural norms and behaviours communicated in public and those people actually internalized (Todeva 1999). Feichtinger and Fink (1998) describe the volatility of culture in the 1990's, and the corresponding confusion at the individual level, as 'collective culture shock'.…”
Section: Managing Cultural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%