2008
DOI: 10.1139/f08-026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models and indicators for assessing conservation and fisheries-related effects of marine protected areas

Abstract: Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available on the publisher Web site 2 base de leur complémentarité, afin d'en déduire des indicateurs adéquats pour aider à la prise de décisions. Dans cette optique, nous suggérons de plus que les gestionnaires de AMP soient associés dès le départ à la mise au point et à la construction des indicateurs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(134 reference statements)
2
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the recruitment functions used here can be deconstructed into components familiar in fisheries models (Ricker 1954;Beverton and Holt 1957), to my knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly couple them when evaluating fishery management. The dearth of empirical estimations on the relative strengths of inter-and intra-cohort density dependent processes, along with the desire to avoid overly-embellished models that introduce unnecessary uncertainty and veil salient dynamics (May 2004;Pelletier et al 2008), has understandably motivated theoretical ecologists to avoid the recruitment functions evaluated here. Yet, given the growing number of spatial, dynamic fisheries models that allow settlement to be spatially and/or temporally uncoupled from local adult density (Pelletier et al 2008), this study emphasizes the importance in considering explicitly coupled density dependence when evaluating reserve management for fisheries with low to moderate harvest costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the recruitment functions used here can be deconstructed into components familiar in fisheries models (Ricker 1954;Beverton and Holt 1957), to my knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly couple them when evaluating fishery management. The dearth of empirical estimations on the relative strengths of inter-and intra-cohort density dependent processes, along with the desire to avoid overly-embellished models that introduce unnecessary uncertainty and veil salient dynamics (May 2004;Pelletier et al 2008), has understandably motivated theoretical ecologists to avoid the recruitment functions evaluated here. Yet, given the growing number of spatial, dynamic fisheries models that allow settlement to be spatially and/or temporally uncoupled from local adult density (Pelletier et al 2008), this study emphasizes the importance in considering explicitly coupled density dependence when evaluating reserve management for fisheries with low to moderate harvest costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dearth of empirical estimations on the relative strengths of inter-and intra-cohort density dependent processes, along with the desire to avoid overly-embellished models that introduce unnecessary uncertainty and veil salient dynamics (May 2004;Pelletier et al 2008), has understandably motivated theoretical ecologists to avoid the recruitment functions evaluated here. Yet, given the growing number of spatial, dynamic fisheries models that allow settlement to be spatially and/or temporally uncoupled from local adult density (Pelletier et al 2008), this study emphasizes the importance in considering explicitly coupled density dependence when evaluating reserve management for fisheries with low to moderate harvest costs. In contrast, the relative timing of inter-and intra-cohort density dependence (represented by the three different density dependent life history scenarios) minimally impacted results, suggesting that it is less important for fisheries models to explicitly consider this factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, one can protect or restore proper age and sex distribution, spawning stocks, and aid the most vulnerable fish populations to recover from overfishing (Beets and Friedlander, 1998;Sala et al, 2001;Heyman et al, 2005;Pelletier et al, 2008;Druon, 2010;Teo and Block, 2010). It is also vital to create marine reserves or protected areas in each country, within the territorial coastal marine waters, in which fishing is banned.…”
Section: Overfishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the spill-over of an MPA, i.e., the number of fish "exported" from the MPA that become available for fishing, is related to a number of parameters including pre-and post-reserve human exploitation level, MPA size, shape, age, fish life history and fish ecological traits (Claudet et al , 2010White et al 2010). This has motivated considerable research toward the development of scientific tools that aid in decision making for MPA design (Pelletier et al 2008;Kaplan et al 2010). To achieve this purpose, we need to fully understand the impact of MPAs on the food web.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%