Modelos não lineares mistos em estudos de degradabilidade ruminal in situ

Sartorio, Simone Daniela

doi:10.11606/t.11.2012.tde-08012013-151513

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 43 publications

(74 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors sought to address the problems of variance heterogeneity and correlations between repeated longitudinal measurements in in situ ruminal degradation kinetic studies by using NLME. From a statistical point of view, similar problems encountered in different contexts and areas can be properly addressed through the use of mixed models, such as seen in J. C. Pinheiro and Bates (2000); Sartrio (2013); Luwanda and Mwambi (2016); Wyzykowski, Custdio, Custdio, Gomes, and Morais (2015); Calama and Montero (2004);and Xu et al (2014). The proposal to apply a mixed effects methodology involving fixed and random effects parameters and the construction of a data (co)variance matrix (Yang, Huang, Trincado, & Meng, 2009) seems adequate to capture between-and within-animal variabilities and allows modeling the degradability of each animal (subject-specific) as the average degradability of all animals (population specific) (Schabenberger & Pierce, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nonlinear Mixed Models Applied to Ruminal Degradability Studies

Janeiro¹,

Rossi²,

Guedes³

et al. 2022

IJSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents an application of three classical models to studies of ruminal degradation kinetics, namely Ørskov and McDonald’s model (1979); Van Milgen, Murphy and Berger’s model (1991), and Richard’s model proposed in France, Dijkstra, and Dhanoa (1996). Our approach is focused on accounting for animal e ects given that measurements are repeated in the same animal. The models were studied under the perspective of nonlinear mixed-e ects (NLME) models. In this way, we intended to accommodate the problems of response variance heterogeneity and correlations between repeated measures. To apply the proposed method, we used data from an experiment conducted in a Latin square design to assess the dry matter degradability of the following three silages: Elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) silage treated with bacterial inoculant, Elephant grass silage treated with enzyme-bacterial inoculant, and corn (Zea mays L.) silage. Samples were incubation for 0, 2, 6, 12 , 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. For these experimental data, the Van Milgen, Murphy, and Berger’s model showed better performance than the others. The proposed approach indicated that inclusion of animal e ects is important for obtaining more accurate information and can be considered in NLME modeling. Furthermore, it was also possible to perform an easy-to-interpret analysis of contrasts between treatments by using Tukey’s test.

show abstract