2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling verification and influence of operational patterns on tribological behaviour of wheel-rail interaction

Abstract: Verification of the explicit finite element (FE) model with realistic wheel-rail profiles against the CONTACT model, which has not been sufficiently discussed, is performed by comparing the resulting shear stress, slip-adhesion area, etc., obtained from the two models. The followup studies using the verified FE model on the influence of the varying operational patterns (such as different friction, traction, etc.) on the surface and subsurface tribological responses of wheel-rail interaction are accomplished th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applicability of contact clearance 0.17 mm to these varying operational patterns has been verified in the authors’ recent work. 32,35…”
Section: Fe Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of contact clearance 0.17 mm to these varying operational patterns has been verified in the authors’ recent work. 32,35…”
Section: Fe Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 To improve the performance of FE simulations on W/R interaction, 24 a novel adaptive mesh refinement procedure based on the 2D geometrical contact analysis is introduced. Also, the accuracy of that model has been successfully verified 31 against CONTACT, which is a rigorous and well-established computational program developed by Professor Kalker 5 and powered by VORtech Computing. 3 The modeling strategy proposed 24 has been further extended to study the dynamic impact between wheel and crossing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this way, the comparability of FE results to those of CONTACT, which focuses on the cases of steady-state contact, 5,33 can be enhanced for the purpose of verification. 19,31 The results of the verification of FE model with realistic W/R profiles considered have already been presented in Ma et al. 31
Figure 1.FE model of W/R dynamic contact: (a) schematic graph; (b) FE model – side view; (c) refined mesh at the rail potential contact area; (d) refined mesh at the wheel potential contact area; (e) FE model – cross-sectional view; (f) close-up view in refined regions.
…”
Section: W/r 3d-fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of friction (  ) is dependent on slip (creepage) velocity between wheel and rail, which was observed by several researchers and described in [26,33]. The slip dependent coefficient of friction can be expressed as (8) where A0 stands for the ratio of friction coefficient (   / 0  ), B0 is the coefficient of exponential friction decrease (in s/m) and s is the total slip or slip velocity (in m/s). For a dry wheel-rail contact scenario, 0  = 0.55, A0 = 0.4 and B0 = 0.6 [34].…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ertz and Knothe [7] have calculated the temperature distribution on the wheel due to rolling along with sliding friction and concluded that the temperature rise due to braking is confined within a very thin layer near the contact surface. Among other notable works, Ma et al [8] studied the tribological…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%