2019
DOI: 10.3390/vehicles1010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Recursive Wheel Wear and Vehicle Dynamic Performance Evolution Computational Model for Rail Vehicles with Tread Brakes

Abstract: The increased temperature of the rail wheels due to tread braking causes changes in the wheel material properties. This article considers the dynamic wheel material properties in a wheel wear evolution model by synergistically combining a multi-body dynamics vehicle model with a finite element heat transfer model. The brake power is estimated from the rail-wheel contact parameters obtained from vehicle model and used in a finite element model to estimate the average wheel temperature. The wheel temperature is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although great attention must be paid to the computational efficiency of the simulation, a direct quantitative comparison of the numerical models described in the previous section cannot be provided. In fact, the numerical tools shown above were Budapest University [65], KTH [38,66,67,[69][70][71][72][73], PoliMi [75], USFD [78], PoliMi + USFD [34,77,79], SWJTU [83], UNiFI + SWJTU [86], Others [88][89][90][91][92] Rail wear models: KTH [74], SWJTU [84] Wheel and rail wear models: Budapest University [36,64] Wheel wear models: AWARE [43,44,[94][95][96], UniFi [98][99][100][101][102]107], SWJTU [109,112], IIT [113][114][115]125], Others [93,97,111,116] Wheel and rail wear models: Un...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although great attention must be paid to the computational efficiency of the simulation, a direct quantitative comparison of the numerical models described in the previous section cannot be provided. In fact, the numerical tools shown above were Budapest University [65], KTH [38,66,67,[69][70][71][72][73], PoliMi [75], USFD [78], PoliMi + USFD [34,77,79], SWJTU [83], UNiFI + SWJTU [86], Others [88][89][90][91][92] Rail wear models: KTH [74], SWJTU [84] Wheel and rail wear models: Budapest University [36,64] Wheel wear models: AWARE [43,44,[94][95][96], UniFi [98][99][100][101][102]107], SWJTU [109,112], IIT [113][114][115]125], Others [93,97,111,116] Wheel and rail wear models: Un...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task is clearly not easy as such numerical tool should be provided with a thermal module, because during tread braking the wheel surface heats up to high temperatures which drastically change the material properties. Research in this field is on-going [124,125], but still a complete model is not witnessed in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. There are also known methods [1][2][3] of dynamic simulation of rolling stock with the analysis of wheel/rail stresses. The above-mentioned methods and approaches for rail head profile restoration by grinding are based on the repetition of an initial rail profile.…”
Section: Analysis Of Rail Grinding Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce this wear, various studies are known in the following areas: optimization of suspension stiffness parameters [1], dynamic analysis of wheel/rail [1; 3], thermal model taking into account the change of material properties from the temperature at braking [2], rail profile measurement by introducing additional measuring sensors 0º and 45º [4], lubrication of rails in curves [5; 18], modeling of FEM on curves of small radius in non-elastic and elastic setting of the problem [6; 7], optimization of wheel hardness [8], optimization of methods of creation of meshes of finite element contact models [9]. The advantage of these studies is a detailed description of the influence of one or more factors on wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can be either 2D axisymmetric or 3D. However, 2D axisymmetric models [5][6][7][8][9][10] are not suitable for the prediction of hot spots, as they assume constant heat fluxes in circumferential direction, while 3D models [11][12][13][14] require huge computational efforts, especially when they are also demanded to solve the contact problem. At the same time, 2D plane models in the radial-circumferential plane were developed too, however they either perform an a priori assumption of the contact pressure [15,16] or they neglect some important phenomena [17], e.g., the dependency of the convection coefficient on wheel speed and the rail chill effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%