2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling variability of solar activity cycles

Abstract: Context. Solar activity cycles vary in amplitude and duration. The variations can be at least partly explained by fluctuations in dynamo parameters. Aims. We want to restrict uncertainty in fluctuating dynamo parameters and find out which properties of the fluctuations control the amplitudes of the magnetic field and energy in variable dynamo cycles. Methods. A flux-transport model for the solar dynamo with fluctuations of the Babcock-Leighton type α-effect was applied to generate statistics of magnetic cycles… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations show that many stars show irregular cycles and possibly extended grand minima (Saar & Testa 2012;Wright 2016). Thus the irregular aspects should be carefully studied, and checked whether the solar dynamo models (Karak & Choudhuri 2011;Hazra et al 2015;Kitchatinov et al 2018) which are successful in explaining many irregular aspects of the solar cycle are capable of explaining the irregular features of other stars. However, seeing the success in reproducing many observational features of stellar cycles in our model, we can have some confidence on the basic assumptions made in our model, and we expect that the prediction made on the quadrupolar field in rapidly rotating stars is true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations show that many stars show irregular cycles and possibly extended grand minima (Saar & Testa 2012;Wright 2016). Thus the irregular aspects should be carefully studied, and checked whether the solar dynamo models (Karak & Choudhuri 2011;Hazra et al 2015;Kitchatinov et al 2018) which are successful in explaining many irregular aspects of the solar cycle are capable of explaining the irregular features of other stars. However, seeing the success in reproducing many observational features of stellar cycles in our model, we can have some confidence on the basic assumptions made in our model, and we expect that the prediction made on the quadrupolar field in rapidly rotating stars is true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of σ = 2.7 and τ = 25.4 days are used in the computations of this paper. These values are inferred from sunspot statistics Kitchatinov et al 2018). The value of δθ = 0.1 (≃ 6 • ) is close to the characteristic latitudinal size of sunspot groups.…”
Section: Regular and Fluctuating Parts Of The α-Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stronger cycles show wider activity belts and thus start to decline earlier than weaker cycles. Nagy et al (2017) and Kitchatinov et al (2018) showed that peculiar BMRs with large tilt angles that emerge during the rising phase of a cycle have large effects on the amplitude of the descending phase. Hence the stochastic mechanism due to random emergence of the peculiar BMRs during the rising phase causes the later phases of the cycle to be noisy, as seen in Figure 5.…”
Section: Properties Of Solar Cycle Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%