1998
DOI: 10.1109/66.705385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling tool for chemical-mechanical polishing design and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The waferparticle contact force f w consists of the force transmitted through the pad-particle contact L p and surface forces between the wafer and the particle, including the vdW f vdw and electrical DL forces F ψ s− p with constant surface charge for a spherical particle and a plane surface: + e −κL [19] where E pad and υ pad are the Young modulus of the asperity and the Poisson ratio of the pad, respectively. A wsp is the effective Hamaker constant, ε r is the relative dielectric constant, ε 0 is the dielectric permittivity of vacuum, κ −1 is the double layer thickness and L is the distance of minimum approach.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The waferparticle contact force f w consists of the force transmitted through the pad-particle contact L p and surface forces between the wafer and the particle, including the vdW f vdw and electrical DL forces F ψ s− p with constant surface charge for a spherical particle and a plane surface: + e −κL [19] where E pad and υ pad are the Young modulus of the asperity and the Poisson ratio of the pad, respectively. A wsp is the effective Hamaker constant, ε r is the relative dielectric constant, ε 0 is the dielectric permittivity of vacuum, κ −1 is the double layer thickness and L is the distance of minimum approach.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the mixed lubrication model taking into account the compressibility of the pad and the mold of slurry delivery 17,18 is used to give reasonable predictions of the pressure profiles and removal rates. 4,19,20 In order to capture the chemical behavior and describe the repetitive removal process of the wafer profile, the surface kinetics model is introduced to relate the overall polish rate to various kinetic processes occurring at the surface modulated by the mechanical parameters.4,21-26 Slurry chemicals which contain oxidizers, inhibitors and other additives in the slurry determining the reaction kinetics play an important role for the passivation of the wafer surface.27-38 The overall MRR is influenced by the existence of different compositions on the wafer surface, 31,34 resulting in the change of the wafer surface hardness, which affects the aggregate wear rate of the wafer material. 30,34,35,37 In addition to the effect on the wafer hardness, slurry chemicals have also been shown to influence the zeta potential of abrasive particles and the wafer, 27,29,35,[39][40][41][42] where the slurry pH was the primary factor affecting the zeta potentials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early ultrasonic machining mostly relies on the ultrasonic vibration of the http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2014. 10.006 0041-624X/Ó 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. instrument which makes the suspending abrasive particles gain sufficient energy to impact the polishing object aiming at removing the rougher part of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With the development of semiconductor technology, it has been accepted wildly [2], and as the rising of ultra large scale integration chips in recent years, it gains ever increasing attentions [3] and appears to be the only available method for global planarization [4,5]. In order to widen the application area and lower the manufacturing cost of chemical-mechanical polishing, many scholars have made efforts to research this polishing technology experimentally and theoretically [6][7][8][9][10][11], to date, it is also the point at issue [4,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a certain polishing condition, Preston coefficient is assumed to be constant in the entire optic/pad interface. Numerous researches have revealed that a uniform distribution of relative velocity can be obtained through the rotations of the optic and the platen at the same speed [17,18]. Therefore, the surface figure, to a great extent, depends on the variation of the pressure distribution on the optic surface [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%