19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling thermo-acoustic instabilities of an anchored laminar flame in a simple lean premixed combustor: including hydrodynamic effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutual interactions of the flame front kinematics and the hydrodynamic flow field are not accounted for [ 39 ], meaning the fresh mixture flow field above the burner outlet and inside the flame can be treated using a simple model which is independent of the flame evolution. It has been shown that when the G -equation model is combined with a simple incompressible velocity perturbation model in the fresh mixture, complex flame front evolution phenomena, including the ‘pinch-off’ that occurs for strong flow perturbations, can be captured [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Determining the Flame Describing Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutual interactions of the flame front kinematics and the hydrodynamic flow field are not accounted for [ 39 ], meaning the fresh mixture flow field above the burner outlet and inside the flame can be treated using a simple model which is independent of the flame evolution. It has been shown that when the G -equation model is combined with a simple incompressible velocity perturbation model in the fresh mixture, complex flame front evolution phenomena, including the ‘pinch-off’ that occurs for strong flow perturbations, can be captured [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Determining the Flame Describing Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DL instability has also been observed experimentally for anchored flames (see Searby, Truffaut & Joulin 2001). A recent preliminary study (Luzzato et al 2013) indicates that its effect on flame-acoustic coupling can be significant in certain cases.…”
Section: R C Assier and X Wumentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It has been established that an incompressible flow field assumption is reasonable for modelling the flame response [20,37]. In addition to this, the coupling between the flame kinematics and the flow field itself may be neglected, such that independent forcing functions for #» u may be applied [39,43],…”
Section: Principal Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%