2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the top-height growth and site index of Norway spruce in Southern Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that not all trees in the top layer of the stand belong to this layer throughout their entire life. As such a change in the canopy position of a tree is quite probable [83], models based on the data from stem analysis can sometimes overestimate growth rates [10]. We used the verification procedure to assess the growth curve of the individual growth series against the background of more trees living in the given area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that not all trees in the top layer of the stand belong to this layer throughout their entire life. As such a change in the canopy position of a tree is quite probable [83], models based on the data from stem analysis can sometimes overestimate growth rates [10]. We used the verification procedure to assess the growth curve of the individual growth series against the background of more trees living in the given area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ALS data enabled the accurate estimation of the top height of tree stands, it is necessary to remember, that for trees and tree stands that were 10 years old in the year 2012, the applied data could have been insufficiently precise. Perin et al [65], based on research in Belgium, claims that a modeling site index for spruces younger than 20 years old is invalid due to very high variability, resulting from weather conditions, damage by animals, etc. Undoubtedly, the use of ALS data contributes to the quality of height increment and site index measurements [66,67], particularly if data from two periods are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach evaluates site quality in terms of the environmental causal factors themselves. A commonly applied method in this regard is to express site quality using the dominant height at a given base age, known as site index (e.g., García, 2005García, , 2011Perin, Hébert, Brostaux, Lejeune, & Claessens, 2013;Skovsgaard & Vanclay, 2008;Weiskittel, Hann, Hibbs, Lam, & Bluhm, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%