2020
DOI: 10.3390/f11030301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Index Models for Main Forest-Forming Tree Species in Poland

Abstract: Site index is the most commonly used measure of potential site productivity, providing key information for forest management practices. It is determined using species-specific site index models that take into account climatic and edaphic factors. To reliably estimate the site index, appropriate models are necessary. In Poland, however, outdated guidelines, i.e., yield tables, are used to determine site classes, which result in the inappropriate estimation of height growth and increments of stands. Therefore, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the ALT method, TH for a sample plot of size A (ha) is calculated on the basis of 160 × A − 0.6 of the thickest trees. The SI was determined for the sample plots using the SI model developed for oak in Poland [40], on the basis of the dynamic formulation of the Korf equation [41], which describes changes in the top height with age Equation 1:…”
Section: Data 221 Sample Plot Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ALT method, TH for a sample plot of size A (ha) is calculated on the basis of 160 × A − 0.6 of the thickest trees. The SI was determined for the sample plots using the SI model developed for oak in Poland [40], on the basis of the dynamic formulation of the Korf equation [41], which describes changes in the top height with age Equation 1:…”
Section: Data 221 Sample Plot Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretzsch et al 32 estimated that in Central Europe, site productivity increased by approximately 30–70%. Additionally, the height growth of observed stands differs significantly from that observed 100 years ago 33 , 34 and included in the original tables. Moreover, the tables produce errors by not considering regional growth variability on a countrywide scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why, it is considered to be an indicator of site productivity [8,[15][16][17]. In forest management practices, site index models are known as a measure of the potential site productivity [18]. Research has highlighted new concerns about estimating the potential of these sites using indices that include characteristics of trees and stands other than height and age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%