2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the location and consequences of aircraft accidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…-continuous improvement of probability and location models to include a wider spectrum of influencing factors, particularly the available excess runway [20]; -also the deceleration model, proposed by Kirkland et al [10] and adopted in the proposed PRA procedure, could be enhanced to remove the limits of a linear approximation and to account for a wider set of terrain and obstacle types; -the consequence model could also be enlarged and improved [20], to integrate some basic vulnerability assessment methods of infrastructure and buildings and also to enable the assessment of more complex accident scenarios (e.g. an overrun event ending with fire or explosion).…”
Section: Conclusion and Possible Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-continuous improvement of probability and location models to include a wider spectrum of influencing factors, particularly the available excess runway [20]; -also the deceleration model, proposed by Kirkland et al [10] and adopted in the proposed PRA procedure, could be enhanced to remove the limits of a linear approximation and to account for a wider set of terrain and obstacle types; -the consequence model could also be enlarged and improved [20], to integrate some basic vulnerability assessment methods of infrastructure and buildings and also to enable the assessment of more complex accident scenarios (e.g. an overrun event ending with fire or explosion).…”
Section: Conclusion and Possible Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1980's the main focus of the organisation of the aviation safety and security system was placed on preventing hijacking of aircrafts (Seidenstat and Splane, 2009) or mitigating the risk connected with airport operations (Jonkman and Verhoeven, 2013;Ayres Jr. et al, 2013). However, since the attacks on 11 September 2001 most attention is being paid to issues of terrorist threats, particularly acts of unlawful interference with the use of small quantities of very strong explosive substances.…”
Section: Overview Of the State Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the coefficients were adopted from a study Modelling the location and Consequences of aircraft accidents [4], which identified 1,414 incidents and accidents from a database of more than 260,000 aviation incidents and accidents and therefore can be considered very accurate. The database also showed that most of the events (83%) happen during landing.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TODRSL stands for Take-off Distance Required at Sea Level and TODR stands for Take-off Distance Required at the airport altitude of 237 meters. The formula used to calculate TODR [9] is: (4) The Take-off overrun scenario with the greatest dimensional requirements was used. The following figure (Figure 2) demonstrate the layout of Take-off overrun areas at both runway ends at Brno Airport.…”
Section: Correction Of Dimensions Of Safety Areas For the Remainimentioning
confidence: 99%