Modelling the impact of a smallpox attack in India and influence of disease control measures

Abstract

ObjectivesTo estimate the impact of a smallpox attack in Mumbai, India, examine the impact of case isolation and ring vaccination for epidemic containment and test the health system capacity under different scenarios with available interventions.SettingThe research is based on Mumbai, India population.InterventionsWe tested 50%, 70%, 90% of case isolation and contacts traced and vaccinated (ring vaccination) in the susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered model and varied the start of intervention between 20, 30 and 40 days after the initial attack.Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe estimated and incorporated in the model the effect of past vaccination protection, age-specific immunosuppression and contact rates and Mumbai population age structure in modelling disease morbidity and transmission.ResultsThe estimated duration of an outbreak ranged from 127 days to 8 years under different scenarios, and the number of vaccine doses needed for ring vaccination ranged from 16 813 to 8 722 400 in the best-case and worst-case scenarios, respectively. In the worst-case scenario, the available hospital beds in Mumbai would be exceeded. The impact of a smallpox epidemic may be severe in Mumbai, especially compared with high-income settings, but can be reduced with early diagnosis and rapid response, high rates of case finding and isolation and ring vaccination.ConclusionsThis study tells us that if smallpox re-emergence occurs, it may have significant health and economic impact, the extent of which will depend on the availability and delivery of interventions such as a vaccine or antiviral agent, and the capacity of case isolation and treatment. Further research on health systems requirements and capacity across the diverse states and territories of India could improve the preparedness and management strategies in the event of re-emergent smallpox or other serious emerging infections.

Human monkeypox infection threat: A comprehensive overview

“…In response to the current MPX epidemic, there is a need to effectively prevent and control the spread of MPX through active control measures, including prompt identification and isolation of cases, nonpharmaceutical shielding methods in the known transmission routes, vaccination of close contacts (ring vaccination) [ 59 ]. Public health organizations should promote and raise awareness about MPX, especially training health workers to rapidly identify, isolate, and manage patients with MPX.…”

Vaccination for Monkeypox Virus Infection in Humans: A Review of Key Considerations

“…This is especially important for high-risk exposures, such as physical contact with an infected person's broken skin/mucous membrane or being near an infected person during an aerosol-generating procedure while not wearing a surgical mask/respirator [24]. Additionally, for epidemic containment, besides rapid diagnostic testing [58] and prompt identification and isolation of cases, vaccination of close contacts (ring vaccination) can help [59]. To limit the spread of monkeypox to both vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons, non-pharmaceutical shielding methods should address the known transmission routes.…”

Is Australia ready for monkeypox?

“…Smallpox vaccines can be given to frontline health care workers and laboratory workers, or as post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for close contacts 14 (called “ring vaccination” 15 ). Vaccines used as PEP are most effective within 4 days of exposure, so contact tracing is critical 14 .…”