1995
DOI: 10.1016/0273-1223(95)00567-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the coliforms inactivation rates in the Cantabrian sea (Bay of Biscay) From and laboratory determinations of T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solar radiation, temperature, and pH are generally believed to be the most important factors (Davies et al 1995), but considering solar radiation as the major factor controlling bacterial decay remains controversial (Whitman et al 2004). A few generic formulations have been proposed which account explicitly for some parameters (Lessard and Sieburth 1983;Alkan et al 1995;Canteras et al 1995), but the most commonly used parameterization for the decay of fecal bacteria is a constant die-off rate (Kashefipour et al 2002;Steets and Holden 2003;Servais et al 2007). The values proposed in the literature for the mortality of fecal bacteria vary widely and are usually associated with site specificities.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solar radiation, temperature, and pH are generally believed to be the most important factors (Davies et al 1995), but considering solar radiation as the major factor controlling bacterial decay remains controversial (Whitman et al 2004). A few generic formulations have been proposed which account explicitly for some parameters (Lessard and Sieburth 1983;Alkan et al 1995;Canteras et al 1995), but the most commonly used parameterization for the decay of fecal bacteria is a constant die-off rate (Kashefipour et al 2002;Steets and Holden 2003;Servais et al 2007). The values proposed in the literature for the mortality of fecal bacteria vary widely and are usually associated with site specificities.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fujioka et al (see Kashefipour et al 2002) presented values of 37-110 day −1 in seawater with good light conditions. In the present model, two alternative options for the definition of the die-off rate are available: a user-defined constant coefficient and the formulation proposed by Canteras et al (1995), which presents a direct relationship between the die-off rate and the environmental conditions (irradiation, salinity and temperature).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thupaki et al (2010) obtained an LTRMSE of 0.41 and Liu et al (2006) in the range of 0.705-0.835. Chen et al (2019) obtained RMSE values for salinity simulations of an estuary in the range of 0.13-3.01.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of The Seawater Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 6 shows the calibrated E. Coli decay rate expressed as T90, defined as the time at which 90% of the bacterial population is no longer detectable, meaning a one-log reduction of the number of pathogens. T90 could be computed as a function of water temperature, salinity and solar radiation (Canteras et al, 1995;Sokolova et al, 2013). However, such formulations was tested and would produce excessive decay rates for this case study and therefore the decay rate was assumed https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-292 Preprint.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of The Sea Water Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%