2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the biogeochemical cycle of silicon in soils: Application to a temperate forest ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(136 reference statements)
4
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…H 0 : µ forest = µ human = (µ urban + µ cropland + µ grassland )/3 versus H 1 : µ forest > µ human (1) H 0 : µ forest = µ agricultural = (µ cropland + µ pasture )/2 versus H 1 : µ forest > µ agricultural (2) H 0 : µ forest = µ urban versus H 1 : µ forest > µ urban (3) H 0 : µ forest = µ grassland versus H 1 : µ forest > µ grassland (4) H 0 : µ forest = µ cropland versus H 1 : µ forest > µ cropland (5) Here, µ forest , µ urban , µ cropland and µ pasture represent the regression coefficients of the proportions of forested area, urban area, cropland and grasslands, respectively. We used a right-sided t-test and constructed the corresponding one-sided confidence interval for each of the contrasts µ forest − µ human (forest versus human), µ forest − µ agricultural (forest versus agriculture), µ forest − µ urban (forest versus urban), µ forest − µ grassland (forest versus grassland) and µ forest − µ cropland (forest versus cropland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H 0 : µ forest = µ human = (µ urban + µ cropland + µ grassland )/3 versus H 1 : µ forest > µ human (1) H 0 : µ forest = µ agricultural = (µ cropland + µ pasture )/2 versus H 1 : µ forest > µ agricultural (2) H 0 : µ forest = µ urban versus H 1 : µ forest > µ urban (3) H 0 : µ forest = µ grassland versus H 1 : µ forest > µ grassland (4) H 0 : µ forest = µ cropland versus H 1 : µ forest > µ cropland (5) Here, µ forest , µ urban , µ cropland and µ pasture represent the regression coefficients of the proportions of forested area, urban area, cropland and grasslands, respectively. We used a right-sided t-test and constructed the corresponding one-sided confidence interval for each of the contrasts µ forest − µ human (forest versus human), µ forest − µ agricultural (forest versus agriculture), µ forest − µ urban (forest versus urban), µ forest − µ grassland (forest versus grassland) and µ forest − µ cropland (forest versus cropland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I t has recently been shown that intense biogeochemical cycling of silica occurs in soils 1,2 . The annual ecosystem biogeochemical cycling of Si exceeds the annual export from continents to the ocean by two orders of magnitude 3,4 and effectively buffers bedrockweathering Si fluxes 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexandre et al 1997;Melzer et al 2012;Gerard et al 2008;Blecker et al 2006). Depth distributions of BSi suggest the presence of a refractory pool of ASi which may include aged BSi (Saccone et al 2006;Cornelis et al 2011).…”
Section: Evidence For Continental Dsi Retention From River Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and pedological processes. Uptake of DSi in the vegetation and dissolution of ASi in soils has been shown to be an important factor for the DSi export to rivers from catchments dominated by boreal wetlands (Struyf et al, 2010a), forests (Gérard et al, 2008) and grasslands (Blecker et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%