2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijbex.2011.037251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the barriers of Six Sigma using interpretive structural modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As ISM relies on individuals assessing whether each individual factor relates to every other factor under investigation, it can be utilised to detect the relationships been variables. Whilst ISM can be conducted as a group learning process, it can also be utilised individually (Ravi & Shankar, 2005): the individual opinions of experts are frequently sought through questionnaires (Alawamleh & Popplewell, 2011;Govindan et al, 2015;Kumar et al, 2013;Pfohl et al, 2011;Sahney et al, 2006;Samantra et al, 2016;Soti et al, 2011;Tripathy et al, 2013). Individual responses to the questionnaire were summed and the most common response utilised to represent consensus, as observed within existing ISM literature (Alawamleh & Popplewell, 2011;Samantra et al, 2016;Tripathy et al, 2013).…”
Section: Interpretive Structural Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ISM relies on individuals assessing whether each individual factor relates to every other factor under investigation, it can be utilised to detect the relationships been variables. Whilst ISM can be conducted as a group learning process, it can also be utilised individually (Ravi & Shankar, 2005): the individual opinions of experts are frequently sought through questionnaires (Alawamleh & Popplewell, 2011;Govindan et al, 2015;Kumar et al, 2013;Pfohl et al, 2011;Sahney et al, 2006;Samantra et al, 2016;Soti et al, 2011;Tripathy et al, 2013). Individual responses to the questionnaire were summed and the most common response utilised to represent consensus, as observed within existing ISM literature (Alawamleh & Popplewell, 2011;Samantra et al, 2016;Tripathy et al, 2013).…”
Section: Interpretive Structural Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14. Soti et al (2011)  The authors postulated that 6σ is a systematic and scientific methodology which excludes probability of making errors and thus consequently leads to business excellence.  They determined 12 barriers in implementation of 6σ from literature and categorized barriers into 3 classes of strategic, tactical and operational ones.…”
Section: Matathil Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different existing frameworks for Six Sigma were reviewed with respect to Indian automotive industry and proposed the need for the development of Six Sigma framework and necessity for implementing Six Sigma for better business opportunity with regards to Indian medium scale automotive organisations in the current competitive era. Soti et al (2011) pointed out that Six Sigma attempts to reduce opportunities to commit mistakes through systematic and statistical driven approach, therefore, business excellence and Six Sigma go hand-in-hand. Paper attempted to model barriers in Six Sigma implementation by establishing relationship among them through interpretive structural modelling (ISM).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%