2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00043-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
308
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
308
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…some data that were outside the mean ± 2SD of all measurements at each measurement cycle for each clone, around 10% of the total measurements), all valid g sto and their linked meteorological data were averaged for each clone at each treatment in one measurement cycle, and were used to calibrate the stomatal conductance model. The Jarvis-type multiplicative stomatal conductance model was applied (Emberson et al, 2000a;Jarvis, 1976;LRTAP Convention, 2010). It includes mathematical functions for phenology (f phen ), photosynthetically photon flux density (f PPFD ), water vapor pressure deficit (f VPD ), temperature (f temp ), soil water potential (f SWP ) and O 3 (f O3 ).…”
Section: Stomatal Conductance Measurements and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…some data that were outside the mean ± 2SD of all measurements at each measurement cycle for each clone, around 10% of the total measurements), all valid g sto and their linked meteorological data were averaged for each clone at each treatment in one measurement cycle, and were used to calibrate the stomatal conductance model. The Jarvis-type multiplicative stomatal conductance model was applied (Emberson et al, 2000a;Jarvis, 1976;LRTAP Convention, 2010). It includes mathematical functions for phenology (f phen ), photosynthetically photon flux density (f PPFD ), water vapor pressure deficit (f VPD ), temperature (f temp ), soil water potential (f SWP ) and O 3 (f O3 ).…”
Section: Stomatal Conductance Measurements and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stomatal O 3 flux was estimated from stomatal conductance to water vapor (g s ), employing the water vapor surrogate method (Emberson et al, 2000;Hoshika et al, 2012b,c). This method assumes the O 3 concentration inside leaves to be close to zero (Laisk et al, 1989;Omasa et al, 2002).…”
Section: Stomatal Ozone Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…soil and cuticular) pathways. The processes governing each deposition pathways are well identified: stomatal deposition is linked with environmental parameters governing stomatal opening (Emberson et al, 2000a), cuticular deposition increases with relative humidity (Zhang et al, 2002;Altimir et al, 2004Altimir et al, , 2006Lamaud et al, 2009) and soil deposition decreases with relative humidity . Moreover, the partitioning between stomatal, cuticular and soil depositions depends on canopy structure: the ozone transfer from the atmosphere towards the ground is reduced when the canopy height and the leaf area index (LAI) increase (van Pul and Jacobs, 1994;Zhang et al, 2002), while stomatal and cuticular depositions increase with canopy LAI (Zhang et al, 2002;Massman, 2004;Tuovinen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%